The Performance Of Team Start-Ups In The First Phases Of The Life Course

This article describes the benefits and pitfalls of starting a firm with an entrepreneurial team, drawing on a longitudinal empirical analysis of the life course of 90 team start-ups and 1196 solo start-ups in the Netherlands. In the first three years of their existence, team start-ups perform better than solo start-ups on several success indicators. However, after this start phase, entrepreneurial teams face particular problems in realizing further growth. These team-specific bottlenecks can even threaten firm survival. In later life course phases we found a clear distinction between entrepreneurial teams with stagnating growth and teams that succeeded in solving these problems and went on to realize further growth.

[1]  Egbert Wever,et al.  Determinants of new firm success , 2000 .

[2]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[4]  Laurence G. Weinzimmer.  Top Management Team Correlates of Organizational Growth in a Small Business Context: A Comparative Study , 1997 .

[5]  Hugo van Driel,et al.  Longevity in Services: The Case of the Dutch Warehousing Companies 1600-2000 , 2004 .

[6]  Sanjay Prasad Thakur,et al.  Size of investment, opportunity choice and human resources in new venture growth: Some typologies , 1999 .

[7]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[8]  J. Seeger,et al.  Entrepreneurial Teams in New Venture Creation: A Research Agenda , 1990 .

[9]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Entrepreneurship Dynamic: Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries , 2002 .

[10]  T. Lechler.  Social Interaction: A Determinant of Entrepreneurial Team Venture Success , 2001 .

[11]  Johan Wiklund,et al.  Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Firm Growth , 2006 .

[12]  Hans Landström,et al.  The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship , 1999 .

[13]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance , 2004 .

[14]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Capitalism and democracy in the 21st Century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy* , 2000 .

[15]  M. Wright,et al.  Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: are they different? , 1998 .

[16]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[17]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition , 2002 .

[18]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance , 2002 .

[19]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory , 2001 .

[20]  D. Storey.  Understanding the small business sector , 1994 .

[21]  Richard N. Cardozo,et al.  A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development , 2003 .

[22]  Hannu Littunen,et al.  Networks and Local Environmental Characteristics in the Survival of New Firms , 2000 .

[23]  David Valler.  Barkham, R., Gudgin, G., Hart, M. and Hanvey, E., "The Determinants of Small Firm Growth: An Inter-regional Study in the UK 1986-90" (Book Review) , 1997 .

[24]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  A Theory of the Early Growth of the Firm , 1998 .

[25]  E. Leach.  The entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries , 2003 .

[26]  Johan Wiklund.  Small Firm Growth and Performance : Entrepreneurship and Beyond , 1998 .