High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice.

PURPOSE Several studies have suggested that KRAS somatic mutations may predict resistance to cetuximab- and panitumumab-based treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Nevertheless, most experiences were conducted on samples from primaries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the grade of concordance in terms of KRAS status between primaries and related metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations from formalin-fixed sections of 107 CRC primaries and related metastases. Eight pairs were excluded from the analysis because of the low amount of tumor tissue in the available samples. The main characteristics were: 50 men, 49 women; median age at diagnosis, 71 years (range, 41-84). The metastatic sites analyzed were the liver in 80 patients (80.8%), lung in seven patients (7.1%), and other sites in 12 patients (12.1%). RESULTS A KRAS mutation was found in 38 (38.4%) primary tumors and in 36 (36.4%) related metastases. The rate of concordance was 96.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.0%-98.9%). Discordance was observed in only four (4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the detection of KRAS mutations in either primary or metastatic tumors from patients with CRC is concordant and this assessment could be used to predict response to targeted therapies such as cetuximab and panitumumab.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2007 , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the ‘RASCAL II’ study , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Roy S Herbst,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor–positive tumors , 2002, Cancer.

[5]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. L. Bos,et al.  ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. , 1989, Cancer research.

[7]  C. Köhne,et al.  Randomized phase III study of irinotecan and 5-FU/FA with or without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The CRYSTAL trial , 2007 .

[8]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  P. Radice,et al.  Different Genetic Features Associated with Colon and Rectal Carcinogenesis , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  A. Norman,et al.  Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the multicenter "RASCAL" study. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  R. A’Hern Sample size tables for exact single‐stage phase II designs , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[16]  R. Berardi,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) downstream signalling pathway in primary colorectal tumours and related metastatic sites: optimising EGFR-targeted treatment options , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  J. Weissfeld,et al.  K-ras gene mutations in normal colorectal tissues from K-ras mutation-positive colorectal cancer patients. , 1997, Cancer research.

[18]  S. Schwartz,et al.  KRAS and BRAF oncogenic mutations in MSS colorectal carcinoma progression , 2007, Oncogene.

[19]  P. Jänne,et al.  EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  R. Berardi,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status in primary colorectal tumors does not correlate with EGFR expression in related metastatic sites: implications for treatment with EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. , 2007, Cancer research.

[23]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[24]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.