Dentin: a dynamic substrate--a review.

The structure of dentin is unusual in that the number and size of its tubules changes as one moves from the periphery toward the pulp chamber. Near the pulp, the tubules are very close together and the water content of this deep dentin is high. Near the enamel, the tubules are far apart, occupying less than 1% of the surface area. When enamel or dentin is cut, the surface becomes covered by an adherent layer of cutting debris called the smear layer. Its composition presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin. It is only about 1 micron thick but its presence modifies the function of the dentin a great deal. It lowers dentin permeability and therefore can be regarded as protective. However, it masks the underlying dentin and hence interferes with attempts to bond dental materials directly to dentin. If it is removed, the dentin becomes much more permeable and fluid shifts across the open tubules can cause sensitivity in vivo. As smear layers are very acid-labile, they often dissolve in oral fluids. Several attempts have been made to replace smear layers with acid resistant structures that accomplish the same function. Smear layer structure is being studied by using both scanning electron microscopy as well as electronic particle sizing equipment. The close adaptation of dental materials to smear layers and to underlying dentin is currently an area of very active research. Removal of smear layers increases adaptation and bonding strength but may increase the incidence of pulpal inflammation if the bonding is not uniform or permanent. The dynamics of dentin are just beginning to be understood.

[1]  D. Pashley,et al.  Bacterial Penetration of Human Dentin in vitro , 1980, Journal of dental research.

[2]  R M FRANK,et al.  Electron microscopy of undecalcified sections of human adult dentine. , 1959, Archives of oral biology.

[3]  I. Kvinnsland,et al.  Micropuncture measurements of interstitial fluid pressure in normal and inflamed dental pulp in cats. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  R. Sognnaes,et al.  Sclerotic Age Changes in Root Dentin of Human Teeth as Observed by Optical, Electron, and X-Ray Microscopy , 1960, Journal of dental research.

[5]  I. Mjör,et al.  The fine structure of corticosteroid-covered, human dentine. , 1972, Archives of oral biology.

[6]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dentin permeability: effects of cavity varnishes and bases. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  R. Bowen,et al.  Adhesive Bonding of Various Materials to Hard Tooth Tissues: Improvement in Bond Strength to Dentin , 1982, Journal of dental research.

[8]  D. Pashley,et al.  The effects of burnishing NaF/kaolin/glycerin paste on dentin permeability. , 1987, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  J. Mitchem,et al.  Bonding of resin dentin adhesives under simulated physiological conditions. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  M. Brännström Dentin and pulp in restorative dentistry , 1982 .

[11]  P.A. Mjör Dentin-Predentin Complex and Its Permeability: Pathology and Treatment Overview , 1985, Journal of dental research.

[12]  M. Brännström,et al.  The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. , 1972, International dental journal.

[13]  J. Borggreven,et al.  Morphology and permeability of the dentinal smear layer. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dentin Permeability: A Comparison of Functional Versus Anatomical Tubular Radii , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[15]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Adhesion to dentin mediated by Gluma: effect of pretreatment with various amino acids. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[16]  E. Theilade,et al.  Role of plaque in the etiology of periodontal disease and caries. , 1976, Oral sciences reviews.

[17]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Materials Science Bond Strength Between Dentin and Restorative Resins Mediated by Mixtures of HEMA and Glutaraldehyde , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[18]  R. Browne,et al.  Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: a review. , 1986, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[19]  H. Thomas The Lamina Limitans of Human Dentinal Tubules , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[20]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dentin permeability: effects of smear layer removal. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  R. Furseth The structure of peripheral root dentin in young human premolars. , 1974, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[22]  M. Brännström,et al.  The sensitivity of dentin. Changes in relation to conditions at exposed tubule apertures. , 1974, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[23]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.

[24]  J. Mitchem,et al.  Effects of time after extraction and depth of dentin on resin dentin adhesives. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[25]  D. Pashley,et al.  The effects of oxalate treatment on the smear layer of ground surfaces of human dentine. , 1985, Archives of oral biology.

[26]  M. Massler,et al.  Microstructure of Active and Arrested Dentinal Caries , 1965 .

[27]  H. Thomas,et al.  Correlation of scanning and transmission electron microscopy of human dentinal tubules. , 1984, Archives of oral biology.

[28]  M. Brännström,et al.  Transmission and control of dentinal pain: resin impregnation for the desensitization of dentin. , 1979, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[29]  H. Thomas The dentin-predentin complex and its permeability: anatomical overview. , 1985, Journal of dental research.

[30]  D. Pashley,et al.  Regional variability in the permeability of human dentine. , 1987, Archives of oral biology.

[31]  D. Weber,et al.  Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy of Tubular Structures Presumed to be Human Odontoblast Processes , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[32]  R. Walton,et al.  Dentin Permeability: Determinants of Hydraulic Conductance , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[33]  A. Jodaikin,et al.  The Effects of Cavity Smear Layer Removal on Experimental Marginal Leakage around Amalgam Restorations , 1981, Journal of dental research.

[34]  R. Frank,et al.  The extent of the human odontoblast process as determined by transmission electron microscopy: the hypothesis of a retractable suspensor system. , 1985, Journal de biologie buccale.

[35]  M. Brännström,et al.  The dentinal tubules and the odontoblast processes. A scanning electron microscopic study. , 1972, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[36]  D. Pashley,et al.  Regional resistances to fluid flow in human dentine in vitro. , 1978, Archives of oral biology.

[37]  D. Pashley,et al.  The effects of a multi-step dentin bonding system on dentin permeability. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[38]  F. Driessens,et al.  Morphology, Composition, and Wetting of Dentinal Cavity Walls , 1974, Journal of dental research.

[39]  D. Pashley,et al.  Effects of the degree of tubule occlusion on the permeability of human dentine in vitro. , 1978, Archives of oral biology.

[40]  L. Tao,et al.  Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[41]  R Garberoglio,et al.  Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. , 1976, Archives of oral biology.

[42]  D. Pashley,et al.  Effects of the smear layer, Copalite, and oxalate on microleakage. , 1986, Operative dentistry.