Advertising montage: Two theoretical perspectives

Building upon structuralist and phenomenological theories, this article explores the effects of video montage—camera cuts in particular—on the appeal and persuasiveness of television advertisements. The article proposes a structuralist method for objectively describing ad form and tests well-known theories propounding that responses to a stimulus are a function of boredom and confusion. Camera cuts, boredom, and confusion were all found to affect subjects' attitude toward the ad. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  S. Papson,et al.  Advertising in the Age of Hypersignification , 1994 .

[2]  P. Cowen,et al.  Manipulating Montage: Effects on Film Comprehension, Recall, Person Perception, and Aesthetic Responses , 1988 .

[3]  R. Penn Effects of motion and cutting-rate in motion pictures , 1971 .

[4]  J. Stevens Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[5]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[6]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[7]  G. Genette,et al.  Narrative Discourse, an Essay in Method. , 1980 .

[8]  Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch,et al.  The Effects of TV Program Comprehensibility on Preschool Children's Visual Attention to Television. , 1981 .

[9]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  Getting an angle in advertising: The effect of camera angle on product evaluations. , 1992 .

[10]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  On the Use of Structural Equation Models in Experimental Designs , 1989 .

[11]  Ferdinand de Saussure Course in General Linguistics , 1916 .

[12]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Ease of message processing as a moderator of repetition effects in advertising. , 1990 .

[13]  T G Bever,et al.  Segmentation in cinema perception. , 1976, Science.

[14]  W. Iser,et al.  The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response , 1979 .

[15]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[16]  D. Berlyne Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[17]  W. Iser,et al.  The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett , 1975 .

[18]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Effective television advertising : a study of 1000 commercials , 1987 .

[19]  P. Kipper,et al.  Television Camera Movement as a Source of Perceptual Information. , 1986 .

[20]  William B. Locander,et al.  Product Novelty: Does it Moderate the Relationship between Ad Attitudes and Brand Attitudes? , 1987 .

[21]  Marvin J. Dainoff,et al.  Advertisement Complexity and Looking Time , 1972 .

[22]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Attention to television: intrastimulus effects of movement and scene changes on alpha variation over time. , 1985, The International journal of neuroscience.

[23]  S. Chatman,et al.  Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film , 1979 .

[24]  Arno J. Rethans,et al.  Effects of Television Commercial Repetition, Receiver Knowledge, and Commercial Length: A Test of the Two-Factor Model , 1986 .

[25]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context , 1989 .

[26]  Analyzing meaning in form: Soap opera's compositional construction of “realness” , 1991 .

[27]  C. Metz Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema , 1974 .

[28]  James H. Watt,et al.  Entropy and Structure , 1977 .

[29]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[30]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .