Biological phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater at very short sludge ages mediated by novel PAO clade Comamonadaceae.

Recent increases in global phosphorus costs, together with the need to remove phosphorus from wastewater to comply with water discharge regulations, make phosphorus recovery from wastewater economically and environmentally attractive. Biological phosphorus (Bio-P) removal process can effectively capture the phosphorus from wastewater and concentrate it in a form that is easily amendable for recovery in contrast to traditional (chemical) phosphorus removal processes. However, Bio-P removal processes have historically been operated at medium to long solids retention times (SRTs, 10-20 days typically), which inherently increases the energy consumption while reducing the recoverable carbon fraction and hence makes it incompatible with the drive towards energy self-sufficient wastewater treatment plants. In this study, a novel high-rate Bio-P removal process has been developed as an energy efficient alternative for phosphorus removal from wastewater through operation at an SRT of less than 4 days. The process was most effective at an SRT of 2-2.5 days, achieving >90% phosphate removal. Further reducing the SRT to 1.7 days resulted in a loss of Bio-P activity. 16S pyrotag sequencing showed the community changed considerably with changes in the SRT, but that Comamonadaceae was consistently abundant when the Bio-P activity was evident. FISH analysis combined with DAPI staining confirmed that bacterial cells of Comamonadaceae arranged in tetrads contained polyphosphate, identifying them as the key polyphosphate accumulating organisms at these low SRT conditions. Overall, this paper demonstrates a novel, high-rate phosphorus removal process that can be effectively integrated with short SRT, energy-efficient carbon removal and recovery processes.

[1]  Jurg Keller,et al.  Operating aerobic wastewater treatment at very short sludge ages enables treatment and energy recovery through anaerobic sludge digestion. , 2013, Water research.

[2]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Characterizing the biochemical activity of full‐scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems: A comparison with metabolic models , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  A. Willems,et al.  NOTES: Comamonadaceae, a New Family Encompassing the Acidovorans rRNA Complex, Including Variovorax paradoxus gen. nov., comb. nov., for Alcaligenes paradoxus (Davis 1969) , 1991 .

[4]  J. Nielsen,et al.  High diversity and abundance of putative polyphosphate-accumulating Tetrasphaera-related bacteria in activated sludge systems. , 2011, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[5]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[6]  J. Nielsen,et al.  'Candidatus Halomonas phosphatis', a novel polyphosphate-accumulating organism in full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[7]  W. Ng,et al.  Identification and occurrence of tetrad-forming Alphaproteobacteria in anaerobic-aerobic activated sludge processes. , 2004, Microbiology.

[8]  V Jegatheesan,et al.  An economic evaluation of phosphorus recovery as struvite from digester supernatant. , 2006, Bioresource technology.

[9]  H. Stratton,et al.  Which are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full‐scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia? , 2006, Journal of applied microbiology.

[10]  K. Schleifer,et al.  rRNA-Targeted Oligonucleotide Probes for the Identification of Genuine and Former Pseudomonads , 1996 .

[11]  Aaron Marc Saunders,et al.  A conceptual ecosystem model of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. , 2010, Water research.

[12]  S. Spring,et al.  Malikia granosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel polyhydroxyalkanoate- and polyphosphate-accumulating bacterium isolated from activated sludge, and reclassification of Pseudomonas spinosa as Malikia spinosa comb. nov. , 2005, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[13]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Identification of Polyphosphate-Accumulating Organisms and Design of 16S rRNA-Directed Probes for Their Detection and Quantitation , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  O. Hao,et al.  Sequencing batch reactor system for nutrient removal : ORP and pH profiles , 1996 .

[15]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Identity and Ecophysiology of Uncultured Actinobacterial Polyphosphate-Accumulating Organisms in Full-Scale Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Plants , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  Maria A M Reis,et al.  Methods for detection and visualization of intracellular polymers stored by polyphosphate-accumulating microorganisms. , 2002, Journal of microbiological methods.

[17]  R. Amann,et al.  Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  Denny S Parker,et al.  Kinetics of Removal of Particulate Chemical Oxygen Demand in the Activated‐Sludge Process , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[19]  Jean-Michel Claverie,et al.  Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  P. Nielsen,et al.  In situ detection of protein-hydrolysing microorganisms in activated sludge. , 2007, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[21]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. , 1995, Microbiological reviews.

[22]  Heijnen,et al.  Minimal aerobic sludge retention time in biological phosphorus removal systems , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  D. Jenkins,et al.  The Effects of MCRT and Temperature on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal , 1992 .

[24]  Y. Kamagata,et al.  Microlunatus phosphovorus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new gram-positive polyphosphate-accumulating bacterium isolated from activated sludge. , 1995, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[25]  B. Patel,et al.  Defluvicoccus vanus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Gram-negative coccus/coccobacillus in the 'Alphaproteobacteria' from activated sludge. , 2005, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[26]  K. Schleifer,et al.  The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. , 1999, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[27]  Steven Pratt,et al.  Enhanced biological phosphorus removal for high-strength wastewater with a low rbCOD:P ratio. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[28]  Lauren M. Bragg,et al.  Fast, accurate error-correction of amplicon pyrosequences using Acacia , 2012, Nature Methods.

[29]  W. Shieh,et al.  Anoxic and oxic biological fluidized bed treatment of amines and phenol , 1995 .

[30]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[31]  S. Kleinsteuber,et al.  Dynamics of Polyphosphate-Accumulating Bacteria in Wastewater Treatment Plant Microbial Communities Detected via DAPI (4′,6′-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole) and Tetracycline Labeling , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[32]  J Keller,et al.  Platforms for energy and nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater: A review. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[33]  N. Bernet,et al.  A sequencing batch reactor system for high-level biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater , 2009, Biodegradation.

[34]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: from micro to macro scale. , 2007, Water research.

[35]  Steven Pratt,et al.  Phosphorus recovery from wastewater through microbial processes. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.