The Structured Mind at Rest: Low-Frequency Oscillations Reflect Interactive Dynamics Between Spontaneous Brain Activity and a Common Architecture for Task Control

The Common Model of Cognition (CMC) has been proposed as a high level framework through which functional neuroimaging data can be predicted and interpreted. Previous work has found the CMC is capable of predicting brain activity across a variety of tasks, but it has not been tested on resting state data. This paper adapts a previously used method for comparing theoretical models of brain structure, Dynamic Causal Modeling, for the task-free environment of resting state, and compares the CMC against six alternate architectural frameworks while also separately modeling spontaneous low-frequency oscillations. For a large sample of subjects from the Human Connectome Project, the CMC provides the best account of resting state brain activity, suggesting the presence of a general purpose structure of connections in the brain that drives activity when at rest and when performing directed task behavior. At the same time, spontaneous brain activity was found to be present and significant across all frequencies and in all regions. Together, these results suggest that, at rest, spontaneous low-frequency oscillations interact with the general cognitive architecture for task-based activity. The possible functional implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Catherine Sibert,et al.  Inferring a Cognitive Architecture from Multitask Neuroimaging Data: A Data-Driven Test of the Common Model of Cognition Using Granger Causality , 2022, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[2]  B. Mueller,et al.  The resting-state causal human connectome is characterized by hub connectivity of executive and attentional networks , 2022, NeuroImage.

[3]  T. Grabowski,et al.  Increased Basal Ganglia Modulatory Effective Connectivity Observed in Resting-State fMRI in Individuals With Parkinson’s Disease , 2022, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The secret life of predictive brains: what’s spontaneous activity for? , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  P. Drew,et al.  Rude mechanicals in brain haemodynamics: non-neural actors that influence blood flow , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[6]  Alexei V. Samsonovich,et al.  Socially emotional brain-inspired cognitive architecture framework for artificial intelligence , 2020, Cognitive Systems Research.

[7]  Jiyoung Kang,et al.  Graph-theoretical analysis for energy landscape reveals the organization of state transitions in the resting-state human cerebral cortex , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  John E. Laird,et al.  Analysis of the human connectome data supports the notion of a “Common Model of Cognition” for human and human-like intelligence across domains , 2019, NeuroImage.

[9]  John E. Laird,et al.  A Standard Model of the Mind: Toward a Common Computational Framework across Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Robotics , 2017, AI Mag..

[10]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[11]  Jason S. Nomi,et al.  Correspondence between evoked and intrinsic functional brain network configurations , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[12]  David R. Vago,et al.  The brain on silent: mind wandering, mindful awareness, and states of mental tranquility , 2016, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Zhongming Liu,et al.  Broadband Electrophysiological Dynamics Contribute to Global Resting-State fMRI Signal , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[16]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Identifying the default mode network structure using dynamic causal modeling on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[17]  Jeffrey S. Anderson,et al.  BOLD Granger Causality Reflects Vascular Anatomy , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Striatal Contributions to Declarative Memory Retrieval , 2012, Neuron.

[22]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  William D. Penny,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Causal Models using AIC, BIC and Free Energy , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[25]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  T. Hendler,et al.  Towards a Neuroscience of Mind-Wandering , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Anterior Temporal Lobes: A Meta-analysis of the Functional Neuroimaging Literature , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Multi-subject analyses with dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  S. Kotz,et al.  Non-motor basal ganglia functions: A review and proposal for a model of sensory predictability in auditory language perception , 2009, Cortex.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[31]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  How do the basal ganglia contribute to categorization? Their roles in generalization, response selection, and learning via feedback , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[34]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A central circuit of the mind , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea , 2007, NeuroImage.

[36]  J C Houk,et al.  Action selection and refinement in subcortical loops through basal ganglia and cerebellum , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  M. Just,et al.  From the Selectedworks of Marcel Adam Just the Organization of Thinking: What Functional Brain Imaging Reveals about the Neuroarchitecture of Complex Cognition , 2022 .

[38]  John R. Anderson How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[39]  Tony O’Hagan Bayes factors , 2006 .

[40]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[42]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Julia M. Huntenburg,et al.  Large-Scale Gradients in Human Cortical Organization , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Zoe Steine-Hanson,et al.  Refining the Common Model of Cognition Through Large Neuroscience Data , 2018, BICA.

[45]  Seth A. Herd,et al.  The Leabra Cognitive Architecture: How to Play 20 Principles with Nature and Win! , 2012 .

[46]  David Naccache,et al.  Standard Model , 2011, Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security.

[47]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..