Coding of on-line and pre-planned movement sequences.

Recent experiments have demonstrated that complex multi-element movement sequences were coded in visual-spatial coordinates even after extensive practice, while relatively simple spatial-temporal movement sequences are coded in motor coordinates after a single practice session. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine if the control process rather than the difficulty of the sequence played a role in determining the pattern of effector transfer. To accomplish this, different concurrent feedback conditions were provided to two groups of participants during practice of the same movement sequence. The results indicated that when concurrent visual feedback was provided during the production of the movement, which was thought to encourage on-line control, the participants performed transfer tests with the contra-lateral limb better when the visual-spatial coordinates were reinstated than when the motor coordinates were reinstated. When concurrent visual feedback was not provided, which was thought to encourage pre-planned control, the opposite was observed. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that the mode of control dictates the coordinate system used to code the movement sequence rather than sequence difficulty or stage of practice as has been proposed.

[1]  Christoph Braun,et al.  EEG correlates of coordinate processing during intermanual transfer , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Planning and online control of goal directed movements when the eyes are ‘relocated’ , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  The Organization of Action Sequences: Evidence From a Relearning Task. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Steven E. Petersen,et al.  Intermanual transfer effects in sequential tactuomotor learning: Evidence for effector independent coding , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[6]  S. Glover Planning and control in action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  Short article: Effects of interlimb practice on coding and learning of movement sequences , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Kenji Doya,et al.  fMRI investigation of cortical and subcortical networks in the learning of abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Representation of movement sequences is related to task characteristics. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Central mechanisms of motor skill learning , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Coordinate processing during the left-to-right hand transfer investigated by EEG , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  Inter-manual transfer and practice: coding of simple motor sequences. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Proportional and nonproportional transfer of movement sequences , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  R. Andrew,et al.  Short article: Sensory generalization and learning about novel colours by poultry chicks , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  The effects of sequence difficulty and practice on proportional and nonproportional transfer , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Sequence Learning: Response Structure and Effector Transfer , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Charles H Shea,et al.  The coding and effector transfer of movement sequences. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  K. Doya,et al.  Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  Y. Guiard On Fitts's and Hooke's laws: simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[23]  C J Worringham,et al.  Peripheral constraint versus on-line programming in rapid aimed sequential movements. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Yannick Blandin,et al.  Specificity of practice: interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.