Post-earthquake damage identification of an RC school building in Nepal using ambient vibration and point cloud data

Abstract This paper presents a damage identification and performance assessment study of a four-story masonry-infilled reinforced concrete building in Sankhu, Nepal, using ambient vibration and point cloud data measurements. The building was severely damaged during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. A set of accelerometers was used to record the ambient response of the building in order to extract its modal parameters, and a series of lidar scans were collected to estimate the surface defects of certain structural components. An initial model of the structure is created using a recently proposed strut model for masonry infills and a novel modeling approach for infilled RC frames. Dimensions are extracted from lidar-derived point cloud data in the absence of as-built drawings. The FE model updating is first performed through a deterministic formulation where optimal model parameters are estimated through a least squares optimization, and then through a Bayesian inference formulation where the joint posterior probability distribution of the updating parameters are estimated based on the prior knowledge of updating parameters and likelihood of measured data. The error functions for both formulations are defined as the difference between identified and model-predicted modal parameters. Two cases of model updating are performed using different parameterizations and different prior information about the damage. In the first case, updating parameters include walls and columns along the four stories of the building and exclude structural components observed to be severely damaged. The prior knowledge about structural component stiffness values is based on the expected material properties. In the second case of model updating, updating parameters include walls and columns of only the first story, and the prior stiffness values are estimated from the point-cloud measurements. The prior values are then updated using the vibration measurements. The damage identification results are in good agreement with visual observations and point cloud damage quantifications. The most probable model parameters in the Bayesian approach are also found to be in good agreement with the optimal results obtained in the deterministic formulation. Finally, it is shown that the probabilistic natural frequency predictions provide more realistic confidence bounds when both modeling errors and parameter uncertainties are accounted for in the prediction process.

[1]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[2]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes , 1991 .

[3]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Modeling Error Estimation and Response Prediction of a 10-Story Building Model Through a Hierarchical Bayesian Model Updating Framework , 2019, Front. Built Environ..

[4]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Bayesian model updating of nonlinear systems using nonlinear normal modes , 2018, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[5]  James L. Beck,et al.  Structural damage detection and assessment by adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2004 .

[6]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .

[7]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  A comprehensive Bayesian approach for model updating and quantification of modeling errors , 2011 .

[8]  James L. Beck,et al.  New Bayesian Model Updating Algorithm Applied to a Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark , 2004 .

[9]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm with Bayesian Inference for Probabilistic Model Updating , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  B. Goller,et al.  Investigation of model uncertainties in Bayesian structural model updating , 2011, Journal of sound and vibration.

[11]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  FIBRE BEAM–COLUMN MODEL FOR NON‐LINEAR ANALYSIS OF R/C FRAMES: PART I. FORMULATION , 1996 .

[12]  Nenad Bićanić,et al.  Damage identification in framed structures using natural frequencies , 1997 .

[13]  C. M. Wen,et al.  A neural network approach for structural identification and diagnosis of a building from seismic response data , 2003 .

[14]  J. Nathan Kutz,et al.  Structural Load Estimation Using Machine Vision and Surface Crack Patterns for Shear-Critical RC Beams and Slabs , 2018, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[15]  Kalil Erazo,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification of State Estimation in Nonlinear Structural Systems with Application to Seismic Response in Buildings , 2016 .

[16]  Christine E. Wittich,et al.  Non-Temporal Point Cloud Analysis for Surface Damage in Civil Structures , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[17]  C. Farrar,et al.  SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FROM AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS ON A BRIDGE , 1997 .

[18]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A Bayesian Probabilistic Approach for Structure Damage Detection , 1997 .

[19]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[20]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Probabilistic identification of simulated damage on the Dowling Hall footbridge through Bayesian finite element model updating , 2015 .

[21]  Mingming Song,et al.  An application of finite element model updating for damage assessment of a two-story reinforced concrete building and comparison with lidar , 2018 .

[22]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[23]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Bayesian seismic strong-motion response and damage estimation with application to a full-scale seven story shear wall structure , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[24]  Vineet R. Kamat,et al.  Evaluation of Augmented Reality for Rapid Assessment of Earthquake-Induced Building Damage , 2007 .

[25]  Andrew W. Smyth,et al.  Bayesian model updating of a full‐scale finite element model with sensitivity‐based clustering , 2017 .

[26]  Supratik Bose Analytical and Numerical Framework for the Seismic Assessment of Infilled RC Frames , 2019 .

[27]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Bayesian methodology for diagnosis uncertainty quantification and health monitoring , 2013 .

[28]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility , 1994 .

[29]  O. S. Salawu Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[30]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Damage Identification Results Obtained Using Finite Element Model Updating , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[31]  S. S. Law,et al.  DAMAGE LOCALIZATION BY DIRECTLY USING INCOMPLETE MODE SHAPES. TECHNICAL NOTE , 2000 .

[32]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non‐collocated heterogeneous sensing , 2009 .

[33]  J. Ching,et al.  Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Bayesian Model Updating, Model Class Selection, and Model Averaging , 2007 .

[34]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models , 2003 .

[35]  E. Peter Carden,et al.  Vibration Based Condition Monitoring: A Review , 2004 .

[36]  Andrew W. Smyth,et al.  Application of the unscented Kalman filter for real‐time nonlinear structural system identification , 2007 .

[37]  Terje Haukaas,et al.  Model Uncertainty in Finite-Element Analysis: Bayesian Finite Elements , 2011 .

[38]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  NATURAL EXCITATION TECHNIQUE AND EIGENSYSTEM REALIZATION ALGORITHM FOR PHASE I OF THE IASC-ASCE BENCHMARK PROBLEM: SIMULATED DATA , 2004 .

[39]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[40]  Pedro Arias-Sánchez,et al.  Assessment of cracks on concrete bridges using image processing supported by laser scanning survey , 2017 .

[41]  Jerome F. Hajjar,et al.  Laser-based surface damage detection and quantification using predicted surface properties , 2017 .

[42]  Supratik Bose,et al.  Simulation Framework for Infilled RC Frames Subjected to Seismic Loads , 2019, Earthquake Spectra.

[43]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Extended Kalman filter for material parameter estimation in nonlinear structural finite element models using direct differentiation method , 2015 .

[44]  G. Roeck,et al.  Structural damage identification of the highway bridge Z24 by FE model updating , 2004 .