Using mobile phones and short message service to deliver self-management interventions for chronic conditions: a meta-review.

BACKGROUND The worldwide burden of chronic disease is widespread and growing. This shift from acute to chronic care requires rethinking how resources are invested in managing these conditions. One response has been to create programs and interventions that have the goal of helping patients better manage their own conditions. Over time, these self-management interventions and strategies have increasingly relied on various technologies for their implementation, with the newest technology being mobile phones and short message service (SMS). AIM The objective of this meta-review was to evaluate the current evidence on the use of mobile phones and SMS to deliver self-management interventions for chronic conditions. METHODS A meta-review was conducted of the 11 systematic reviews (SRs) that were identified and retrieved after an extensive search of electronic databases covering the years 2000-2012. Relevant information was abstracted from each systematic review and a quality assessment carried out using the AMSTAR ("A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews") criteria. FINDINGS The number and types of included studies and total number of subjects varied significantly across the systematic reviews. Mobile phone text messaging was reported to significantly improve adherence to appointments and antiretroviral therapy, short-term smoking quit rates, and selected clinical and behavioral outcomes. AMSTAR scores ranged from 11 to 3, reflecting substantial variation in SR quality. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION Mobile phones and SMS show promise as a technology to deliver self-management interventions to improve outcomes of chronic care management. However, the quality of future studies and systematic reviews needs to be improved. There also are unresolved issues about the technology itself.

[1]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  B. Fjeldsoe,et al.  Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  L. Whitehead,et al.  Evolution of the concept of self-care and implications for nurses: a literature review. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[4]  M. Wilde,et al.  A concept analysis of self-monitoring. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  K. Shea,et al.  Delineation of self-care and associated concepts. , 2011, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[6]  J. Car,et al.  Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  E. Balas,et al.  Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[8]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. , 2002, JAMA.

[9]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Systematic review of text-messaging interventions to promote healthy behaviors in pediatric and adolescent populations: implications for clinical practice and research. , 2012, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[10]  A. Clark,et al.  A meta-review of evidence on heart failure disease management programs: the challenges of describing and synthesizing evidence on complex interventions , 2011, Trials.

[11]  K. Lorig,et al.  A disease-specific self-help program compared with a generalized chronic disease self-help program for arthritis patients. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  Sally Morton,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Chronic Disease Self-Management Programs for Older Adults , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  B. Holtz,et al.  Diabetes management via mobile phones: a systematic review. , 2012, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[15]  C. Wright,et al.  Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[16]  Mark Speechley,et al.  Health Technologies for Monitoring and Managing Diabetes: A Systematic Review , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[17]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  Jennifer S. Lin,et al.  Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[20]  Xueli Yang,et al.  Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[21]  G. Rutherford,et al.  Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Asynchronous and Synchronous Teleconsultation for Diabetes Care: A Systematic Literature Review , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[23]  S. Krishna,et al.  Diabetes Self-Management Care via Cell Phone: A Systematic Review , 2008, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[24]  J. Car,et al.  Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  K. Lorig,et al.  Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[26]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.