Individual differences in cognition: Some relationships between personality and memory

Abstract Individual differences in cognition were studied in the form of the hypothesis that arousal, as indexed by personality measures of extraversion and neuroticism, affects the way in which verbal material is organized in memory. Subjects pretested on measures of these personality variables participated in either a paired-associates learning or a free-recall experiment. On the paired-associates task, subjects who were thought to be high on arousal made fewer errors when response terms were semantically similar than low arousal subjects. On the other hand, subjects thought low on arousal made fewer errors when response words were phonetically similar than high arousal subjects. On the free-recall task, low arousal subjects were found to cluster words together on the basis of semantic category at a higher rate than high arousal subjects. These results were taken to support the view that high arousal (as indexed by personality measures) leads to a focus on the physical aspects of verbal material, whereas low arousal leads to a memory organized around semantic aspects. The implications of these findings for other views of memory are discussed.

[1]  J. Taylor,et al.  A personality scale of manifest anxiety. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  An analysis of the visual component in recognition memory for verbal stimuli , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Steven Schwartz,et al.  Decision processing in memory: Factors influencing the storage and retrieval of linguistic and form identification , 1974 .

[4]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[5]  Arousal and recall: Effects of noise on two retrieval strategies. , 1974 .

[6]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Relative effectiveness of rhymes and synonyms as retrieval cues. , 1974 .

[7]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[9]  E. Walker,et al.  Action decrement and its relation to learning. , 1958 .

[10]  R Kesner,et al.  A neural system analysis of memory storage and retrieval. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  W. Schönpflug Paarlernen, Behaltensdauer und Aktivierung , 1966 .

[12]  E. Saltz Manifest anxiety: Have we misread the data? , 1970 .

[13]  R. S. Corteen Skin conductance changes and word recall. , 1969, British journal of psychology.

[14]  E. Hunt,et al.  Individual Differences in Cognition: A New Approach to Intelligence , 1973 .

[15]  I. Maltzman,et al.  Immediate and delayed retention, arousal, and the orienting and defensive reflexes , 1966 .

[16]  H. Eysenck Biological Basis of Personality , 1963, Nature.

[17]  G R Hockey,et al.  Information selection, arousal and memory. , 1972, British journal of psychology.

[18]  R. Margolin,et al.  Arousal effects in intentional recall and forgetting. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  L. Kleinsmith,et al.  INTERACTION OF AROUSAL AND RECALL INTERVAL IN NONSENSE SYLLABLE PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  W. Penfield,et al.  Speech and Brain‐Mechanisms , 1960 .

[21]  D. Nelson,et al.  Retroactive inhibition of rhyme categories in free recall: Inacessibility and unavailability of information. , 1974 .

[22]  P. D. Mclean,et al.  INDUCED AROUSAL AND TIME OF RECALL AS DETERMINANTS OF PAIRED‐ASSOCIATE RECALL , 1969 .

[23]  J. Borkowski,et al.  Effects of Anxiety on Storage and Retrieval Processes in Short-Term Memory , 1973, Psychological reports.