TceSR two‐component regulatory system of Brucella melitensis 16M is involved in invasion, intracellular survival and regulated cytotoxicity for macrophages

The mechanisms of invasion and intracellular survival of Brucella are still poorly understood. Previous studies showed that the two‐component regulatory systems (TCSs) play an important role in the intracellular survival of Brucella. To investigate if TCSs involve in the virulence and cytotoxicity of Brucella melitensis, we introduced a mutation into one of the TCSs in chromosome II in Br. melitensis 16M strain, and generated 16MΔTceSR, a mutant of Br. melitensis 16M strain. In vitro infection experiments using murine macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7) showed that the survival of 16MΔTceSR mutant in macrophages decreased 0·91‐log compared with that of wild type Br. melitensis 16M strain at 2 h postinfection, replication of 16MΔTceSR mutant in macrophages was 5·65‐log, which was much lower than that wild type strain. Results of lactate dehydrogenase cytotoxicity assays in macrophages demonstrated high dose infection with wide type strain produced high level cytotoxicity to macrophages, but 16MΔTceSR mutant had very low level cytotoxicity, indicating mutation of TCSs impaired the cytotoxicity of Br. melitensis to macrophages. Animal experiments showed that the spleen colonization of 16MΔTceSR was significantly reduced compared with its wild type strains. The lower levels of survival of 16MΔTceSR in various stress conditions suggested that the mutation of the TCSs of Br. melitensis was the causative factor of its reduced resistance to stress conditions. Taken together, our results demonstrated TCS TceSR involves in the intracellular survival, virulence and cytotoxicity of Br. melitensis during its infection.

[1]  Qingmin Wu,et al.  Cold shock protein A plays an important role in the stress adaptation and virulence of Brucella melitensis. , 2014, FEMS microbiology letters.

[2]  J. Letesson,et al.  Brucella adaptation and survival at the crossroad of metabolism and virulence , 2011, FEBS letters.

[3]  S. Ahmed,et al.  An overview of Brucellosis. , 2011, Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ.

[4]  D. Ussery,et al.  Differences in two-component signal transduction proteins among the genus Brucella: implications for host preference and pathogenesis. , 2010, Veterinary microbiology.

[5]  J. Gorvel,et al.  Transcriptome Analysis of the Brucella abortus BvrR/BvrS Two-Component Regulatory System , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  Yufei Wang,et al.  The type IV secretion system affects the expression of Omp25/Omp31 and the outer membrane properties of Brucella melitensis. , 2010, FEMS microbiology letters.

[7]  Yufei Wang,et al.  Cytotoxicity of Brucella smooth strains for macrophages is mediated by increased secretion of the type IV secretion system. , 2009, Microbiology.

[8]  Ruifu Yang,et al.  Comparative Proteomics Analyses Reveal the virB of B. melitensis Affects Expression of Intracellular Survival Related Proteins , 2009, PloS one.

[9]  S. Boyle,et al.  Brucella: a pathogen without classic virulence genes. , 2008, Veterinary microbiology.

[10]  J. Puente,et al.  The BMEI0216 gene of Brucella melitensis is required for internalization in HeLa cells. , 2008, Microbial pathogenesis.

[11]  Qingmin Wu,et al.  Cytotoxicity in Macrophages Infected with Rough Brucella Mutants Is Type IV Secretion System Dependent , 2007, Infection and Immunity.

[12]  T. Ficht,et al.  Brucella abortus Rough Mutants Are Cytopathic for Macrophages in Culture , 2004, Infection and Immunity.

[13]  J. Liautard,et al.  The intramacrophagic environment of Brucella suis and bacterial response. , 2002, Veterinary microbiology.

[14]  J. Liautard,et al.  Characterization of Brucella suis clpBand clpAB Mutants and Participation of the Genes in Stress Responses , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  E. J. Young,et al.  An overview of human brucellosis. , 1995, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.