What's in a Like?: Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook

What social value do Likes on Facebook hold? This research examines people's attitudes and behaviors related to receiving one-click feedback in social media. Likes and other kinds of lightweight affirmation serve as social cues of acceptance and maintain interpersonal relationships, but may mean different things to different people. Through surveys and de-identified, aggregated behavioral Facebook data, we find that in general, people care more about who Likes their posts than how many Likes they receive, desiring feedback most from close friends, romantic partners, and family members other than their parents. While most people do not feel strongly that receiving “enough” Likes is important, roughly two-thirds of posters regularly receive more than “enough.” We also note a “Like paradox,” a phenomenon in which people's friends receive more Likes because their friends have more friends to provide those Likes. Individuals with lower levels of self-esteem and higher levels of self-monitoring are more likely to think that Likes are important and to feel bad if they do not receive “enough” Likes. The results inform product design and our understanding of how lightweight interactions shape our experiences online.

[1]  D. J. Lee Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[2]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  A bumpy ride on the information superhighway: Exploring turbulence online , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties , 2013, CSCW.

[4]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. , 2006, Psychological assessment.

[6]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  A Test of Warranting Theory Using Facebook , 2009 .

[8]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. , 1995 .

[9]  Amanda L. Forest,et al.  When Social Networking Is Not Working , 2012, Psychological science.

[10]  Urs Gasser,et al.  Teens, social media, and privacy , 2013 .

[11]  R. Lennox,et al.  Revision of the self-monitoring scale. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Self-Esteem, Interpersonal Risk, and Preference for E-Mail to Face-To-Face Communication , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[13]  M. Rosenberg Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[14]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social Network Site Affordances and Their Relationship to Social Capital Processes , 2015 .

[15]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Self-Affirmation Underlies Facebook Use , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[18]  Tamara Peyton Emotion to Action?: Deconstructing the Ontological Politics of the “Like” Button , 2013 .

[19]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009, Commun. Res..

[21]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Room for interpretation: the role of self-esteem and CMC in romantic couple conflict , 2014, CHI.

[22]  M. Leary,et al.  Handbook of individual differences in social behavior , 2009 .

[23]  Moira Burke Reading, Writing, Relationships: The Impact of Social Network Sites on Relationships and Well-Being , 2011 .

[24]  David Westerman,et al.  Young adults' use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[26]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use , 2014, CHI.

[27]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[28]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks , 2013, CHI.

[29]  S. Feld Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Jeffrey A. Hall,et al.  Self-monitoring, honesty, and cue use on Facebook: The relationship with user extraversion and conscientiousness , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[32]  Alexander K. Saeri,et al.  Threats to belonging on Facebook: lurking and ostracism , 2015 .