Part 1: The role of waste data in building knowledge: the South African waste information system.

An empirical study was undertaken with 31 organisations submitting data to the South African Waste Information System (SAWIS) in order to explore the relationship between data and resultant waste knowledge generated through a process of learning. The results show that of the three constructs of knowledge (experience, data/information, and theory), experience has the greatest influence on building waste knowledge, nearly twice that of data/information and three times that of theory. Together the three constructs account for 54.1% of the variance in knowledge. Respondents from municipalities and private waste organisations reflect two distinct sub-groups in the data set. While the theoretical model remains the same for the two sub-groups, the way in which knowledge is constructed, and the variance in knowledge explained by the model, differs for the two. A mixed methods research design, combining quantitative statistical analysis and rich qualitative data, contributes to a comprehensive interpretation of the role of waste data in building knowledge in South Africa. While waste data has a minor influence on building knowledge, respondents acknowledge that waste data does have a positive impact on the way their organisations manage waste. However, it is not the data, but rather the resultant waste knowledge and raised level of awareness that causes the operational response. Experience is obtained predominantly through learning from others. Respondents in municipalities, emphasised learning from consultants, landfill site contractors, and colleagues in city-twinning programmes, while respondents in private waste companies, emphasised learning from experienced, senior colleagues.

[1]  Verna Allee,et al.  The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence , 1997 .

[2]  Linda Godfrey,et al.  Facilitating the improved management of waste in South Africa through a national waste information system. , 2008, Waste management.

[3]  Gastón Sánchez Trujillo Pathmox approach: segmentation trees in partial least squares path modeling , 2009 .

[4]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[5]  Linda Godfrey,et al.  Improving waste management through a process of learning: the South African waste information system , 2011, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[6]  J. Teasdale Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change? , 1978 .

[7]  Edward E. David A Department of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[8]  Henk M.G.J. Trum Aspects of quality in Continuing Engineering Education , 2014 .

[9]  V. Allee The future of knowledge : increasing prosperity through value networks , 2003 .

[10]  M. Tenenhaus Component-based Structural Equation Modelling , 2008 .

[11]  Miquel Sànchez-Marrè,et al.  Designing and building real environmental decision support systems , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[13]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management , 1989 .

[14]  A. Schout,et al.  Learning theory reconsidered: EU integration theories and learning , 2009 .

[15]  Cristina Trois,et al.  Part II--the effect of data on waste behaviour: the South African waste information system. , 2012, Waste management.

[16]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[17]  I. Ajzen Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations , 2002 .

[18]  Langdon Morris,et al.  Fourth Generation R&D , 1999 .

[19]  Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi,et al.  PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement , 2010 .

[20]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management , 1987 .

[21]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[22]  C. Moser,et al.  The Gendered Nature of Asset Accumulation in Urban Contexts , 2010 .

[23]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[24]  Langdon Morris,et al.  Fourth Generation R&D: Managing Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation , 1999 .

[25]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha , 2008, Psychometrika.

[26]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[27]  Tomás Aluja,et al.  Pathmox Approach of Segmentation Trees in Partial Least SquaresPath Modeling , 2013 .

[28]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[29]  B. Whitley Principles of research in behavioral science , 1996 .

[30]  NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION SOUTH AFRICA WASTE INFORMATION SYSTEM ALTERNATIVE WEIGHING AND VERIFICATION METHODS FOR LANDFILL AND HEALTH CARE FACILITIES OCTOBER 2006 DANIDA , 2006 .

[31]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[32]  R. Sheshinski Indirect data collection for waste statistics and waste indicators , 2002 .