An intervention to improve interprofessional collaboration and communications: A comparative qualitative study

Interprofessional communication and collaboration are promoted by policymakers as fundamental building blocks for improving patient safety and meeting the demands of increasingly complex care. This paper reports qualitative findings of an interprofessional intervention designed to improve communication and collaboration between different professions in general internal medicine (GIM) hospital wards in Canada. The intervention promoted self-introduction by role and profession to a collaborating colleague in relation to the shared patient, a question or communication regarding the patient, to be followed by an explicit request for feedback from the partner professional. Implementation and uptake of the intervention were evaluated using qualitative methods, including 90 hours of ethnographic observations and interviews collected in both intervention and comparison wards. Documentary data were also collected and analysed. Fieldnotes and interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Our findings suggested that the intervention did not produce the anticipated changes in communication and collaboration between health professionals, and allowed us to identify barriers to the implementation of effective collaboration interventions. Despite initially offering verbal support, senior physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals minimally explained the intervention to their junior colleagues and rarely role-modelled or reiterated support for it. Professional resistances as well as the fast paced, interruptive environment reduced opportunities or incentive to enhance restrictive interprofessional relationships. In a healthcare setting where face-to-face spontaneous interprofessional communication is not hostile but is rare and impersonal, the perceived benefits of improvement are insufficient to implement simple and potentially beneficial communication changes, in the face of habit, and absence of continued senior clinician and management support.

[1]  L. G. Conn,et al.  Interprofessional interaction, negotiation and non-negotiation on general internal medicine wards , 2009, Journal of interprofessional care.

[2]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  M. Lipkin,et al.  Using Bedside Rounds to Teach Communication Skills in the Internal Medicine Clerkship , 2007, Medical education online.

[4]  A. Simpson The impact of team processes on psychiatric case management. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  Cynthia Whitehead,et al.  The doctor dilemma in interprofessional education and care: how and why will physicians collaborate? , 2007, Medical education.

[6]  F. Ross World Health Organization Announcement , 2007 .

[7]  A. Atwal,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of multidisciplinary team work in acute health-care. , 2006, International journal of nursing practice.

[8]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Knowledge translation and interprofessional collaboration: Where the rubber of evidence‐based care hits the road of teamwork , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[9]  Enrico Coiera,et al.  Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? , 2006, Journal of critical care.

[10]  M. Keane,et al.  Can a facilitated programme promote effective multidisciplinary audit in secondary care teams? An exploratory trial. , 2005, International journal of nursing studies.

[11]  E. Etchells,et al.  Frequency, type and clinical importance of medication history errors at admission to hospital: a systematic review , 2005, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[12]  S. Wilson,et al.  Benefits of multidisciplinary case conferencing using audiovisual compared with telephone communication: a randomized controlled trial , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  The Romanow gaps: some closing, others still open , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[14]  S. Reeves,et al.  Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: strategies and meanings , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[15]  L. Fagin,et al.  The doctor–nurse relationship , 2004 .

[16]  S. Sheps,et al.  The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[17]  Maureen Coombs,et al.  Medical hegemony in decision-making--a barrier to interdisciplinary working in intensive care? , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  David M Studdert,et al.  Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. , 2003, Surgery.

[19]  Roy Romanow,et al.  Building on Values: Report of the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada [Reports] , 2002 .

[20]  Ingvild Saltvedt,et al.  Reduced Mortality in Treating Acutely Sick, Frail Older Patients in a Geriatric Evaluation and Management Unit. A Prospective Randomized Trial , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  Sheldon H Gottlieb,et al.  A randomized trial of the efficacy of multidisciplinary care in heart failure outpatients at high risk of hospital readmission. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  R A Primhak,et al.  Training the ideal hospital doctor: the specialist registrars’ perspective , 2001, Medical education.

[23]  C. Boult,et al.  A Randomized Clinical Trial of Outpatient Geriatric Evaluation and Management , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  J Dacre,et al.  Clinical teaching: maintaining an educational role for doctors in the new health care environment , 2000, Medical education.

[25]  S D Berns,et al.  The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. The MedTeams Research Consortium. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[26]  J. E. McEachern,et al.  A firm trial of interdisciplinary rounds on the inpatient medical wards: an intervention designed using continuous quality improvement. , 1998, Medical care.

[27]  B. Svarstad,et al.  The Impact of Regular Multidisciplinary Team Interventions on Psychotropic Prescribing in Swedish Nursing Homes , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[28]  P. Warelow Nurse-doctor relationships in multidisciplinary teams: ideal or real? , 1996, International journal of nursing practice.

[29]  S. Aksaranugraha,et al.  A controlled clinical trial of multidisciplinary team approach in the general medical wards of Chulalongkorn Hospital. , 1995, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[30]  G B Clack,et al.  Medical graduates evaluate the effectiveness of their education , 1994, Medical education.

[31]  H. Burton,et al.  The doctor-nurse relationship: an historical perspective. , 1986, Journal of advanced nursing.

[32]  B. Kalisch,et al.  An Analysis of the Sources of Physician Nurse Conflict , 1977, The Journal of nursing administration.

[33]  H. Barr,et al.  The renewal of primary health care. , 2009, Journal of interprofessional care.

[34]  Jeph Herrin,et al.  Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  S. Hoffman,et al.  World Health Organization Study Group on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice. , 2007, Journal of interprofessional care.

[36]  W. Levinson,et al.  The future of general internal medicine. Report and recommendations from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine. , 2004, Journal of general internal medicine.

[37]  David L Katz,et al.  Effects of interdisciplinary rounds on length of stay in a telemetry unit. , 2004, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[38]  Roberto Venosa,et al.  Negotiations: varieties, contexts, processes and social order , 1992 .

[39]  J. Last The future of health in Canada. , 1988, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[40]  M. Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .