A Composition Theorem for Parity Kill Number

In this work, we study the parity complexity measures C<sub>min</sub><sup>⊕</sup>[f] and DT<sup>⊕</sup>[f]. C<sub>min</sub><sup>⊕</sup>[f] is the parity kill number of f, the fewest number of parities on the input variables one has to fix in order to "kill" f, i.e. To make it constant. DT<sup>⊕</sup>[f] is the depth of the shortest parity decision tree which computes f. These complexity measures have in recent years become increasingly important in the fields of communication complexity [1], [2], [3], [4] and pseudorandomness [5], [6], [7]. Our main result is a composition theorem for C<sub>min</sub><sup>⊕</sup>. The k-th power of f, denoted f<sup>ok</sup>, is the function which results from composing f with itself k times. We prove that if f is not a parity function, then C<sub>min</sub><sup>⊕</sup>[f<sup>ok</sup>] ≥ Ω (C<sub>min</sub>[f]<sup>k</sup>). In other words, the parity kill number of f is essentially super multiplicative in the normal kill number of f (also known as the minimum certificate complexity). As an application of our composition theorem, we show lower bounds on the parity complexity measures of Sort<sup>ok</sup> and HI<sup>ok</sup>. Here sort is the sort function due to Ambainis [8], and HI is Kushilevitz's hemi-icosahedron function [9]. In doing so, we disprove a conjecture of Montanaro and Osborne [2] which had applications to communication complexity and computational learning theory. In addition, we give new lower bounds for conjectures of [2], [3] and [4].

[1]  Alexander A. Razborov,et al.  On the Distributional Complexity of Disjointness , 1992, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Amir Shpilka,et al.  On the structure of boolean functions with small spectral norm , 2013, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[3]  T. Sanders,et al.  Analysis of Boolean Functions , 2012, ArXiv.

[4]  Ryan O'Donnell,et al.  A Composition Theorem for the Fourier Entropy-Influence Conjecture , 2013, ICALP.

[5]  Bala Kalyanasundaram,et al.  The Probabilistic Communication Complexity of Set Intersection , 1992, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[6]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Polynomial degree vs. quantum query complexity , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[7]  Avishay Tal,et al.  Properties and applications of boolean function composition , 2013, ITCS '13.

[8]  Zhiqiang Zhang,et al.  On the parity complexity measures of Boolean functions , 2010, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Shengyu Zhang,et al.  Fourier Sparsity, Spectral Norm, and the Log-Rank Conjecture , 2013, 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[10]  Ryan O'Donnell,et al.  Analysis of Boolean Functions , 2014, ArXiv.

[11]  Avishay Tal,et al.  Two Structural Results for Low Degree Polynomials and Applications , 2014, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[12]  Troy Lee,et al.  THE QUANTUM ADVERSARY METHOD AND CLASSICAL FORMULA SIZE LOWER BOUNDS , 2005, 20th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'05).

[13]  Ryan O'Donnell,et al.  Every decision tree has an influential variable , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[14]  Noam Nisan,et al.  On rank vs. communication complexity , 1994, Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[15]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[16]  Ashley Montanaro,et al.  On the communication complexity of XOR functions , 2009, ArXiv.

[17]  Pooya Hatami,et al.  Variations on the Sensitivity Conjecture , 2011, Theory Comput..

[18]  Ryan O'Donnell,et al.  Learning monotone decision trees in polynomial time , 2006, 21st Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'06).

[19]  Rahul Jain,et al.  The Influence Lower Bound Via Query Elimination , 2011, Theory Comput..

[20]  Eli Ben-Sasson,et al.  Affine dispersers from subspace polynomials , 2009, STOC '09.

[21]  Ronen Shaltiel,et al.  Dispersers for Affine Sources with Sub-polynomial Entropy , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[22]  Troy Lee,et al.  Negative weights make adversaries stronger , 2007, STOC '07.

[23]  Shachar Lovett,et al.  Communication is bounded by root of rank , 2013, STOC.

[24]  Zhiqiang Zhang,et al.  Communication complexities of symmetric XOR functions , 2009, Quantum Inf. Comput..