Digital image processing versus visual assessment of chewed two-colour wax in mixing ability tests.

Two-colour chewing gum and wax have been widely used as test foods to evaluate the ability to mix and knead a food bolus. The mixing of the colours has been assessed by computer analysis or by visual inspection. Reports contradict each other about whether computer analysis and visual assessment could equally well discriminate between the masticatory performances of groups of participants with different dental status. This study compares the results of computer analysis of digital images of chewed two-colour wax with the results of visual assessment of these images. Sixty healthy subjects participated and chewed on red-blue wax for 5, 10, 15 and 20 chewing strokes. The subjects were divided into three groups of 20, matched for age and gender, according to their dental status: natural dentition, full dentures and maxillary denture plus implant-supported mandibular overdenture. Mixing of the chewed wax was determined by computer analysis of images of the wax and by visual assessment of the images by five examiners. Both the computer method and the observers were able to distinguish the mixing abilities of the dentate subjects from the two denture wearer groups. Computer analysis could also discriminate the mixing abilities of the two denture groups. However, observers were not able to distinguish the mixing abilities of the two denture groups after 5, 10 and 15 chewing strokes. Only after 20 chewing strokes, they could detect a significant difference in mixing ability.

[1]  J. Prinz Quantitative evaluation of the effect of bolus size and number of chewing strokes on the intra-oral mixing of a two-colour chewing gum. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[2]  T. Ohyama,et al.  A new and simple method for evaluating masticatory function using newly developed artificial test food. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[3]  T. Ohyama,et al.  Validity and reliability of a newly developed method for evaluating masticatory function using discriminant analysis. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  B. Liedberg,et al.  Oral bolus kneading and shaping measured with chewing gum , 2004, Dysphagia.

[5]  K. Stoltze,et al.  The masticatory handicap of wearing removable dentures in elderly men. , 2005, Gerodontology.

[6]  T. Ohyama,et al.  Detection of improvement in the masticatory function from old to new removable partial dentures using mixing ability test. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[7]  N. Garrett,et al.  Objective and subjective hardness of a test item used for evaluating food mixing ability. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  M Schimmel,et al.  A two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: development of different assessment methods. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  Y. Igarashi,et al.  Comparisons between a mixing ability test and masticatory performance tests using a brittle or an elastic test food. , 2009, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  Mixing ability test compared with a comminution test in persons with normal and compromised masticatory performance. , 2009, European journal of oral sciences.

[11]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  Comparing masticatory performance and mixing ability. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  H. Kwon,et al.  Subjective food intake ability in relation to the Mixing Ability Index in Korean adults. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  Mastication in patients treated for malignancies in tongue and/or floor of mouth: A 1‐year prospective study , 2011, Head & neck.

[14]  A. Bilt,et al.  Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review. , 2011, Journal of oral rehabilitation.