The Gender Gap in Possible Selves: Divergence of Academic Self-Views Among High School and University Students

Two studies were designed to investigate the current and possible academic self-views of university and high school students. In the first study, upper level university students were shown to diverge by gender in their current- and possible-self-views. Women reported more ability for and identification with the arts, communication, and social sciences; men reported more ability for and identification with mathematics, science, technology, and business. Gender differences were greater with respect to possible future selves than to current selves. The second study included lower and upper level university students as well as high school students. Again, a gender divergence appeared among the university students; however, it was not as marked among high school students. Analyses showed that both women and men differed significantly across educational levels in their self-ratings and that, within the masculine-stereotyped academic domains linked to powerful careers, university women endorsed fewer possibilities for themselves that high school women did. These findings suggest that, as they make the transition from high school to university, young women may be actively closing off possibilities for their futures.

[1]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  A. Eagly Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[3]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  Women’s Career Development: A Postmodern Update , 2005 .

[4]  Ingrid Schoon,et al.  Teenage job aspirations and career attainment in adulthood: A 17-year follow-up study of teenagers who aspired to become scientists, health professionals, or engineers , 2001 .

[5]  L. Ross,et al.  The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology , 1991 .

[6]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[7]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Superstars and me : Predicting the impact of role models on the self , 1997 .

[8]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  Learning in a Man's World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas , 2002 .

[9]  J. Eccles Gender Roles and Women's Achievement-Related Decisions , 1987 .

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. , 2002 .

[11]  M. J. Noruésis,et al.  SPSS-X advanced statistics guide , 1985 .

[12]  R. Kärkkäinen,et al.  Parents' Explanations of Their Child's Performance in Mathematics and Reading: A Replication and Extension of Yee and Eccles , 2002 .

[13]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Recent Developments in Cognitive Approaches to Counseling and Psychotherapy , 1988 .

[14]  D. Marx,et al.  Female Role Models: Protecting Women’s Math Test Performance , 2002 .

[15]  H. Markus,et al.  Possible Selves , 2001 .

[16]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers , 2000 .

[17]  Susan E. Cross,et al.  Training the Scientists and Engineers of Tomorrow: A Person‐Situation Approach1 , 2001 .

[18]  H. Lips Through the Lens of Mathematical/Scientific Self‐Schemas: Images of Students' Current and Possible Selves1 , 1995 .

[19]  Susan E. Cross,et al.  The Interdependent Self-Construal and Social Support: The Case of Persistence in Engineering , 2001 .

[20]  G. Hackett Role of Mathematics Self-Efficacy in the Choice of Math- Related Majors of College Women and Men: A Path Analysis , 1985 .