Fe b 20 03 Weak Values and Consistent Histories in Quantum Theory December 5 , 2002

A relation is obtained between weak values of quantum observables and the consistency criterion for histories of quantum events. It is shown that “strange” weak values for projection operators (such as values less than zero) always correspond to inconsistent families of histories. It is argued that using the ABL rule to obtain probabilities for counterfactual measurements corresponding to those strange weak values gives inconsistent results. This problem is shown to be remedied by using the conditional weight, or pseudo-probability, obtained from the multiple-time application of Luders’ Rule. It is argued that an assumption of reverse causality (a form of time symmetry) implies that weak values obtain, in a restricted sense, at the time of the weak measurement as well as at the time of post-selection. Finally, it is argued that weak values are more appropriately characterised as multiple-time amplitudes than expectation values, and as such can have little to say about counterfactual questions.

[1]  R. Griffiths Consistent Quantum Theory , 2001 .

[2]  S. Saunders Space Time and Probability , 2001, quant-ph/0112081.

[3]  S. Popescu,et al.  Revisiting Hardy's Paradox: Counterfactual Statements, Real Measurements, Entanglement and Weak Values , 2001, quant-ph/0104062.

[4]  J. Bub Secure Key Distribution via Pre- and Post-Selected Quantum States , 2000, quant-ph/0006086.

[5]  J. Bub,et al.  Interpreting the Quantum World , 1998, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences.

[6]  R. Kastner The Three-Box “Paradox” and Other Reasons to Reject the Counterfactual Usage of the ABL Rule , 1998, quant-ph/9807037.

[7]  R. Griffiths Consistent quantum counterfactuals , 1998, quant-ph/9805056.

[8]  Griffiths,et al.  Consistent histories and quantum reasoning. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  L. Vaidman Weak-measurement elements of reality , 1996, quant-ph/9601005.

[10]  Cohen Pre- and postselected quantum systems, counterfactual measurements, and consistent histories. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[11]  L. Vaidman Elements of Reality and the Failure of the Product Rule Measurability of Commuting Observables , 1993, hep-th/9310176.

[12]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Complete description of a quantum system at a given time , 1991 .

[13]  P. Busch Surprising features of unsharp quantum measurements , 1988 .

[14]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Quantum implications : essays in honour of David Bohm , 1988 .

[15]  J. Norton Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics , 2016 .

[16]  A. Khrennikov On negative probabilities. , 2007 .

[17]  Huw Price,et al.  Time's Arrow and Archimedes’ Point , 1997 .

[18]  N. Mermin How to Ascertain the Values of Every Member of a Set of Observables that Cannot all Have Values , 1997 .

[19]  Vaidman,et al.  Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.