Age-related maculopathy and sunlight exposure evaluated by objective measurement

Aim: To study the relationship between age-related maculopathy (ARM) and exposure to sunlight using an objective method. Methods: In a case–control study of Japanese men aged ⩾50 years (67 controls without ophthalmic disease and 148 with ARM), those with ARM were separated into groups of early (n = 75) and late (n = 73) ARM. Facial wrinkle length and area of hyperpigmentation, which are considered to be associated with exposure to sun, were measured using imaging with computer-based image analysis. Skin tone was also measured on the upper inner arm, which is not exposed to sun. Early and late ARM association with skin measurements was then evaluated. Results: Significantly more facial wrinkling (p = 0.047, odds ratio 3.8; 95% CI 1.01 to 13.97) and less facial hyperpigmentation (p = 0.035, odds ratio 0.3; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.92) was present in late ARM cases. The relationship between skin tone and ARM risk was not statistically significant. Conclusions: This objective method showed that lifetime exposure to sunlight is an important factor in the progression of late ARM. An individual’s reaction to sunlight exposure may have a role in ARM progression in addition to total lifetime exposure to sunlight.

[1]  A. Hofman,et al.  Complement factor H polymorphism, complement activators, and risk of age-related macular degeneration. , 2006, JAMA.

[2]  A C Bird,et al.  Age related macular degeneration and sun exposure, iris colour, and skin sensitivity to sunlight , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Clayton,et al.  Smoking and age related macular degeneration: the number of pack years of cigarette smoking is a major determinant of risk for both geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularisation , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  K. Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Zinc uptake and storage: the role of fundus pigmentation , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[5]  A. Young,et al.  Melanogenesis: a photoprotective response to DNA damage? , 2005, Mutation research.

[6]  R. Klein,et al.  The relationship between iris color, hair color, and skin sun sensitivity and the 10-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[7]  B. Rosner,et al.  Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  Donna Arnett,et al.  Twin study of age-related macular degeneration , 2003, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[9]  R. Klein,et al.  Ten-year incidence of age-related maculopathy and smoking and drinking: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  C. Delcourt,et al.  Light exposure and the risk of age-related macular degeneration: the Pathologies Oculaires Liées à l'Age (POLA) study. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  M Ichihashi,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of skin condition in an epidemiological survey of females living in northern versus southern Japan. , 2001, Journal of dermatological science.

[12]  G. Hillebrand,et al.  Influence of chronic UV exposure and lifestyle on facial skin photo-aging--results from a pilot study. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology.

[13]  J. J. Wang,et al.  Iris color, skin sun sensitivity, and age-related maculopathy. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[14]  J. Voorhees,et al.  Pathophysiology of premature skin aging induced by ultraviolet light. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P Darzins,et al.  Sun exposure and age-related macular degeneration. An Australian case-control study. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[16]  H. Luukinen,et al.  Risk factors of age-related maculopathy in a population 70 years of age or older. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[17]  P T de Jong,et al.  An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration , 1995 .

[18]  R. Klein,et al.  Sunlight and age-related macular degeneration. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  G. M. Ridder,et al.  Age, sunlight, and facial skin: a histologic and quantitative study. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[20]  B. Munoz,et al.  Exposure to sunlight and other risk factors for age-related macular degeneration. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  T. Fitzpatrick The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. , 1988, Archives of Dermatology.

[22]  O. Schein,et al.  Sunlight and Age-Related Macular Degeneration , 2005, International ophthalmology clinics.

[23]  U. Brunk,et al.  Aging of cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells: oxidative reactions, lipofuscin formation and blue light damage , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[24]  R. Klein,et al.  Sibling correlations and segregation analysis of age‐related maculopathy: The beaver dam eye study , 1994, Genetic epidemiology.

[25]  F S Rosenthal,et al.  The long-term effects of visible light on the eye. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  Risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  B. Munoz,et al.  Visible light and risk of age-related macular degeneration. , 1990, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[28]  T. Fitzpatrick The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. , 1988, Archives of dermatology.

[29]  J. Prignot Quantification and chemical markers of tobacco-exposure. , 1987, European journal of respiratory diseases.