Comparison of soft-breakdown triggers for large-area capacitors under constant voltage stress

This work quantitatively compares soft breakdown identification methods for constant voltage stress of large-area nMOS capacitors (up to 10 mm/sup 2/) with 1.8- to 12-nm gate-oxide thickness (with negative gate voltage). We conclude that in the studied range, breakdown is identified more reliably with a current step trigger than through increased current fluctuation. We present a method to quantify the system background noise, and show results of data filtering algorithms that significantly enhance the ratio between the breakdown signal and background noise level.

[1]  M. Heyns,et al.  Soft breakdown of ultra-thin gate oxide layers , 1996 .

[2]  Constantin Papadas,et al.  Accelerated dielectric breakdown and wear out standard testing methods and structures for reliability evaluation of thin oxides , 1999 .

[3]  W. Abadeer,et al.  Structural dependence of dielectric breakdown in ultra-thin gate oxides and its relationship to soft breakdown modes and device failure , 1998, International Electron Devices Meeting 1998. Technical Digest (Cat. No.98CH36217).

[4]  R. Degraeve,et al.  Accurate and robust noise-based trigger algorithm for soft breakdown detection in ultra thin oxides , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 39th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37167).

[5]  D. Hwang,et al.  Ultra-thin gate dielectrics: they break down, but do they fail? , 1997, International Electron Devices Meeting. IEDM Technical Digest.

[6]  J. Bude,et al.  Explanation of soft and hard breakdown and its consequences for area scaling , 1999, International Electron Devices Meeting 1999. Technical Digest (Cat. No.99CH36318).

[7]  Don Monroe,et al.  TUNNELING CURRENT NOISE IN THIN GATE OXIDES , 1996 .

[8]  G.B. Alers,et al.  J-ramp on sub-3 nm dielectrics: noise as a breakdown criterion , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 37th Annual (Cat. No.99CH36296).