New force replica exchange method and protein folding pathways probed by force-clamp technique.

We have developed a new extended replica exchange method to study thermodynamics of a system in the presence of external force. Our idea is based on the exchange between different force replicas to accelerate the equilibrium process. This new approach was applied to obtain the force-temperature phase diagram and other thermodynamical quantities of the three-domain ubiquitin. Using the C(alpha)-Go model and the Langevin dynamics, we have shown that the refolding pathways of single ubiquitin depend on which terminus is fixed. If the N end is fixed then the folding pathways are different compared to the case when both termini are free, but fixing the C terminal does not change them. Surprisingly, we have found that the anchoring terminal does not affect the pathways of individual secondary structures of three-domain ubiquitin, indicating the important role of the multidomain construction. Therefore, force-clamp experiments, in which one end of a protein is kept fixed, can probe the refolding pathways of a single free-end ubiquitin if one uses either the polyubiquitin or a single domain with the C terminus anchored. However, it is shown that anchoring one end does not affect refolding pathways of the titin domain I27, and the force-clamp spectroscopy is always capable to predict folding sequencing of this protein. We have obtained the reasonable estimate for unfolding barrier of ubiquitin, using the microscopic theory for the dependence of unfolding time on the external force. The linkage between residue Lys48 and the C terminal of ubiquitin is found to have the dramatic effect on the location of the transition state along the end-to-end distance reaction coordinate, but the multidomain construction leaves the transition state almost unchanged. We have found that the maximum force in the force-extension profile from constant velocity force pulling simulations depends on temperature nonlinearly. However, for some narrow temperature interval this dependence becomes linear, as have been observed in recent experiments.

[1]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Alan M. Ferrenberg,et al.  Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. , 1989, Physical Review Letters.

[3]  A. Garcia,et al.  Reversible temperature and pressure denaturation of a protein fragment: a replica exchange molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[4]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Lattice Model Studies of Force-Induced Unfolding of Proteins † , 2001 .

[5]  A. Irbäck,et al.  Thermal versus mechanical unfolding of ubiquitin , 2006, Proteins.

[6]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Finite size effects on thermal denaturation of globular proteins. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[7]  J. Sorenson,et al.  Toward minimalist models of larger proteins: A ubiquitin‐like protein , 2002, Proteins.

[8]  G. Dittmar,et al.  Cell Cycle–Regulated Modification of the Ribosome by a Variant Multiubiquitin Chain , 2000, Cell.

[9]  Chin-Kun Hu,et al.  Free energy landscape and folding mechanism of a β‐hairpin in explicit water: A replica exchange molecular dynamics study , 2005, Proteins.

[10]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Intrinsic rates and activation free energies from single-molecule pulling experiments. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[11]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Ariel Fernández.  Time‐resolved backbone desolvation and mutational hot spots in folding proteins , 2002, Proteins.

[13]  Elmer S. West.  From the U. S. A. , 1965 .

[14]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of hydrophobic collapse of ubiquitin , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  Mai Suan Li,et al.  Secondary structure, mechanical stability, and location of transition state of proteins. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Chin-Kun Hu,et al.  Folding of the protein domain hbSBD. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[17]  W. C. Still,et al.  The GB/SA Continuum Model for Solvation. A Fast Analytical Method for the Calculation of Approximate Born Radii , 1997 .

[18]  D. Makarov,et al.  Ubiquitin-like Protein Domains Show High Resistance to Mechanical Unfolding Similar to That of the I27 Domain in Titin: Evidence from Simulations , 2004 .

[19]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Effect of finite size on cooperativity and rates of protein folding. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[20]  W. C. Swope,et al.  A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physi , 1981 .

[21]  Finite size effects on calorimetric cooperativity of two-state proteins , 2004, q-bio/0412008.

[22]  S. Jackson,et al.  Ubiquitin folds through a highly polarized transition state. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[23]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  A ubiquitin ligase complex assembles linear polyubiquitin chains , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[24]  A. Pelizzola,et al.  Ising-like model for protein mechanical unfolding. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[25]  R. Haguenauer‐Tsapis,et al.  Ubiquitin Lys63 is involved in ubiquitination of a yeast plasma membrane protein , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[26]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  Temperature-dependence of protein hydrogen bond properties as studied by high-resolution NMR. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  E. Evans,et al.  Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[29]  George I. Makhatadze,et al.  Hydration of the peptide backbone largely defines the thermodynamic propensity scale of residues at the C′ position of the C-capping box of α-helices , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Shaheynoor Talukder,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[31]  F. Young.  Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[32]  Chin-Kun Hu,et al.  Refolding upon force quench and pathways of mechanical and thermal unfolding of ubiquitin. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[33]  S. Radford,et al.  Mechanical resistance of proteins explained using simple molecular models. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[34]  W. Eaton,et al.  Probing the free-energy surface for protein folding with single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy , 2002, Nature.

[35]  S. Khorasanizadeh,et al.  Folding and stability of a tryptophan-containing mutant of ubiquitin. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[36]  Andrei Tokmakoff,et al.  Conformational changes during the nanosecond-to-millisecond unfolding of ubiquitin. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Protein folding in a force clamp. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[38]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[39]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[40]  H. Erickson,et al.  Stretching Single Protein Molecules: Titin Is a Weird Spring , 1997, Science.

[41]  C. Pickart,et al.  Noncanonical MMS2-Encoded Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme Functions in Assembly of Novel Polyubiquitin Chains for DNA Repair , 1999, Cell.

[42]  Fan-Chi Lin,et al.  Temperature control device for single molecule measurements using the atomic force microscope , 2006 .

[43]  D. Makarov,et al.  Simulation of the mechanical unfolding of ubiquitin: probing different unfolding reaction coordinates by changing the pulling geometry. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[44]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Kinetics from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[45]  K. Schulten,et al.  Single-Molecule Experiments in Vitro and in Silico , 2007, Science.

[46]  M. Karplus,et al.  Protein-folding dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[47]  D. Makarov,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of segment-swapped protein G dimer: results from replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[48]  K. Hukushima,et al.  Exchange Monte Carlo Method and Application to Spin Glass Simulations , 1995, cond-mat/9512035.

[49]  Hui Lu,et al.  The mechanical stability of ubiquitin is linkage dependent , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[50]  Hongbin Li,et al.  The unfolding kinetics of ubiquitin captured with single-molecule force-clamp techniques. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[52]  Simon Mitternacht,et al.  Dissecting the mechanical unfolding of ubiquitin. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Julio M Fernandez,et al.  Force-Clamp Spectroscopy Monitors the Folding Trajectory of a Single Protein , 2004, Science.

[54]  K. Schulten,et al.  Unfolding of titin immunoglobulin domains by steered molecular dynamics simulation. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[55]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Thermal denaturation and folding rates of single domain proteins: size matters , 2003, q-bio/0310020.

[56]  Robin S. Dothager,et al.  Characterizing the protein folding transition state using psi analysis. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[57]  Jian-Min Yuan,et al.  Reversible mechanical unfolding of single ubiquitin molecules. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[58]  Multiple stepwise refolding of immunoglobulin domain I27 upon force quench depends on initial conditions. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Cooperativity in protein folding: from lattice models with sidechains to real proteins. , 1998, Folding & design.

[60]  C. Tanford.  Macromolecules , 1994, Nature.

[61]  Martin Rechsteiner,et al.  Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[62]  Ariel Fernández.  Conformation-dependent environments in folding proteins , 2001 .

[63]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Comment on "Force-Clamp Spectroscopy Monitors the Folding Trajectory of a Single Protein" , 2005, Science.

[64]  Julio M Fernandez,et al.  Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals signatures of glassy dynamics in the energy landscape of ubiquitin , 2006 .

[65]  G. I. Bell.  Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[66]  J. Klafter,et al.  Beyond the conventional description of dynamic force spectroscopy of adhesion bonds , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[68]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. , 1996, Folding & design.