Analysis of a Lever-Driven Wheelchair Prototype and the Correlation Between

Abstract In this experimental study a lever-driven wheelchair prototype was compared with a manual wheelchair. The push force of 13 able-bodied human participants was measured over the range of motion required to propel the lever-driven wheelchair prototype and the standard manual wheelchair. The push force that is required to propel each wheelchair was measured statically using strain gauges and dynamically using a purpose built dynamometer to quantify high and low force areas and to determine if correlation exists to wheelchair performance. The force exerted, simulated peak wheelchair velocity, acceleration, torque and power, were examined. The 13 human participants completed five maximal effort tests in the lever-driven wheelchair and three maximal effort tests in a manual wheelchair on the dynamometer. A multiple regression and a Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient analysis were performed on the acquired data and a p-value of less than 0.05 level of significance was found; suggesting a correlation does exist between the static and dynamic force measurement methods.

[1]  R. Waters,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome in paraplegic patients. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  D Veeger,et al.  Mechanical advantage in wheelchair lever propulsion: effect on physical strain and efficiency. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  L H V van der Woude,et al.  Mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique after 7 weeks of low-intensity wheelchair training. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  H E Veeger,et al.  Physical strain and mechanical efficiency in hubcrank and handrim wheelchair propulsion. , 1995, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[5]  P Engel,et al.  Technological and physiological characteristics of a newly developed hand-lever drive system for wheelchairs. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  L. A. Rozendaal,et al.  Load on the shoulder in low intensity wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  D. Theisen,et al.  Wheelchair Propulsion Biomechanics , 2001, Sports medicine.

[8]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Wheelchair ergonomics and physiological testing of prototypes. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[9]  H E Veeger,et al.  Physiological evaluation of a newly designed lever mechanism for wheelchairs. , 1993, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Physical work capacity after 7 wk of wheelchair training: effect of intensity in able-bodied subjects. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  K. Maki,et al.  Energy cost and locomotive economy of handbike and rowcycle propulsion by persons with spinal cord injury. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  L Cordain,et al.  Metabolic and heart rate responses to submaximal arm lever and arm crank ergometry. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Rick Chartrand,et al.  Numerical Differentiation of Noisy, Nonsmooth Data , 2011 .