La cupule cornet de glace comme implant de reconstruction de sauvetage au cours des reprises de prothèse totale de hanche avec perte de substance acétabulaires majeures

[1]  N. Reina,et al.  Use of morselized allografts for acetabular reconstruction during THA revision: French multicenter study of 508 cases with 8 years' average follow-up. , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[2]  D. Huten,et al.  Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls). , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[3]  H. Migaud,et al.  Acetabular reconstruction using porous metallic material in complex revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review. , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[4]  L. Kerboull,et al.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects , 2018, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  E. Gibon,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: A MINIMUM FIVE‐YEAR FOLLOW‐UP STUDY , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[6]  H. Miura,et al.  Acetabular reconstruction with the Kerboull-type plate at mid-term follow-up: survivorship analysis and prognostic factors for loosening , 2018, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[7]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  P. Mertl,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up. , 2017, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[9]  R. Kuroda,et al.  Multiple Revision Surgeries and Acetabular Bone Defect Size May Predict Daily Activity After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  M. V. van Hooff,et al.  Current Construct Options for Revision of Large Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review , 2016, JBJS reviews.

[11]  M. Dominkus,et al.  Review of the outcomes of complex acetabular reconstructions using a stemmed acetabular pedestal component. , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[12]  R. Kuroda,et al.  Risk factors for failure of revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device , 2016, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[13]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  S. Goodman,et al.  Interaction of Materials and Biology in Total Joint Replacement - Successes, Challenges and Future Directions. , 2014, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[15]  D. Regis,et al.  Acetabular Reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider Antiprotrusio Cage and Bulk Allografts: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Results , 2014, BioMed research international.

[16]  Edmund Lau,et al.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  D. Howie,et al.  Progression of periacetabular osteolytic lesions. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  J. Tricoire,et al.  Total hip revision using a cup design with a peg to treat severe pelvic bone defects. , 2012, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[19]  N. Bergman,et al.  The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  N. Badhe,et al.  A stemmed acetabular component in the management of severe acetabular deficiency. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  O. Svensson,et al.  Early loosening of the stemmed McMinn cup. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  W. Harris,et al.  The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  L. Kerboull,et al.  The Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device in Major Acetabular Reconstructions , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  D'Antonio Ja.  Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management. , 1992 .

[26]  E. Spitznagel,et al.  ASA Physical Status Classifications: A Study of Consistency of Ratings , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[27]  P. Ring.  Complete replacement arthroplasty of the hip by the ring prosthesis. , 1968, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[29]  G. Pignatti,et al.  A 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up of a Modular Iliac Screw Cup in Major Acetabular Defects: Clinical, Radiographic and Survivorship Analysis With Comparison to the Literature. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  K. Kawanabe,et al.  Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  H. Yajima,et al.  Vascularised fibular grafts for reconstruction of the femur. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  J. D’Antonio.  Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management. , 1992, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[33]  R. Merled'Aubigné,et al.  [Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 1970]. , 1990, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[34]  O. Bischel,et al.  Send Orders of Reprints at Reprints@benthamscience.org Multiple Acetabular Revisions in Tha -poor Outcome despite Maximum Effort , 2022 .