Plant zonation in low‐latitude salt marshes: disentangling the roles of flooding, salinity and competition

Summary 1 We investigated the factors producing zonation patterns of the dominant plants in south-eastern USA salt marshes where Juncus roemerianus dominates the high marsh, and Spartina alterniflora the middle and low marsh. 2 Juncus did not occur naturally in the Spartina zone and performed poorly when transplanted there, irrespective of whether neighbours were present or removed, indicating that its lower limit was set by physical stress. 3 In contrast, although Spartina occurred naturally at low densities in the Juncus zone, it performed well if transplanted there only if neighbours were removed, indicating that its upper limit was set by competition. 4 Parallel laboratory and field manipulations of flooding, salinity and competition indicated that the lower limit of Juncus was mediated by both flooding and salinity, but not by competition. 5 The general mechanisms producing zonation patterns of vegetation in coastal salt marshes may be universal, as suggested by previous studies, but the importance of particular factors is likely to vary geographically. In particular, salinity stress probably plays a much more important role in mediating plant zonation patterns at lower latitudes. 6 Our results suggest that the nature of ecological interactions is likely to vary geographically because of variation in the physical environment, and this variation must be taken into account in order to successfully generalize the results of field studies across geographical scales.

[1]  M. Bertness,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE INTERACTIONS AMONG SALT MARSH PLANTS , 2003 .

[2]  A. Snow,et al.  Plant zonation in an Alaskan salt marsh. II: An experimental study of the role of edaphic conditions , 1984 .

[3]  S. Pennings,et al.  Salt Marsh Plant Zonation: The Relative Importance of Competition and Physical Factors , 1992 .

[4]  J. Rozema,et al.  Ecophysiological adaptations of coastal halophytes from foredunes and salt marshes , 1985, Vegetatio.

[5]  A. Davy,et al.  Development and Organization of Saltmarsh Communities , 1992 .

[6]  J. Wilson,et al.  The use of field transplants in determining environmental tolerance in salt marshes of Otago, New Zealand , 1988 .

[7]  S. Pennings,et al.  THE ADVANTAGES OF CLONAL INTEGRATION UNDER DIFFERENT ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS: A COMMUNITY-WIDE TEST , 2000 .

[8]  J. Zedler,et al.  Differential effects of four abiotic factors on the germination of salt marsh annuals. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[9]  L. N. Eleuterius.  The distribution ofJuncus roemerianus in the salt marshes of North America , 1976 .

[10]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence , 1984 .

[11]  J. Grace.  Effects of water depth on Typha latifolia and Typha domingensis. , 1989 .

[12]  P. Stiling,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SALINITY AND NUTRIENTS ON A TRITROPHIC SALT-MARSH SYSTEM , 2002 .

[13]  E. D. Seneca,et al.  The effects of standing water and drainage potential on the Spartina Alterniflora-substrate complex in a North Carolina salt marsh , 1980 .

[14]  B. E. Mahall,et al.  The Ecotone Between Spartina Foliosa Trin. and Salicornia Virginica L. in Salt Marshes of Northern San Francisco Bay: II. Soil Water and Salinity , 1976 .

[15]  M. Bertness,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF A POSITIVE PLANT INTERACTION , 1995 .

[16]  P. Keddy.  Effects of competition from shrubs on herbaceous wetland plants: a 4-year field experiment , 1989 .

[17]  J. Travis,et al.  The Role of Abiotic Factors in Community Organization , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[18]  C. Costa,et al.  Plant zonation in irregularly flooded salt marshes: relative importance of stress tolerance and biological interactions , 2003 .

[19]  M. Bertness,et al.  Salt stress limitation of seedling recruitment in a salt marsh plant community , 1992, Oecologia.

[20]  Mark D. Bertness,et al.  Structure and organization of a northern New England salt marsh plant community , 2004 .

[21]  L. N. Eleuterius.  Vegetative Morphology and Anatomy of the Salt Marsh Rush, Juncus roemerianus , 1976 .

[22]  M. Bertness,et al.  Physical Stress and Positive Associations Among Marsh Plants , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Determinants of Pattern in a New England Salt Marsh Plant Community , 1987 .

[24]  G. Noe.  TEMPORAL VARIABILITY MATTERS: EFFECTS OF CONSTANT VS. VARYING MOISTURE AND SALINITY ON GERMINATION , 2002 .

[25]  E. D. Seneca,et al.  Aeration, nitrogen and salinity as determinants of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Growth response , 1981 .

[26]  J. Zedler,et al.  Differential effects of salinity and soil saturation on native and exotic plants of a coastal salt marsh , 1997 .

[27]  B. E. Mahall,et al.  The Ecotone Between Spartina Foliosa Trin. and Salicornia Virginica L. in Salt Marshes of Northern San Francisco Bay: III. Soil Aeration and Tidal Immersion , 1976 .

[28]  V. J. Chapman,et al.  Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World. , 1960 .

[29]  E. Dunn,et al.  Seasonal patterns of CO2 and water vapor exchange of three salt marsh succulents , 1979, Oecologia.

[30]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Mark D. Bertness,et al.  Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes , 2002, Oecologia.

[32]  James T. Morris,et al.  Eco-Physiological Controls on the Productivity of Spartina Alterniflora Loisel , 2002 .

[33]  W. T. Williams.  Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts , 1961, Nature.

[34]  M. Bertness,et al.  Flood tolerance and the distribution of Iva frutescens across New England salt marshes , 1992, Oecologia.

[35]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The C-S-R model of primary plant strategies — origins, implications and tests , 1988 .

[36]  M. Bertness,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR FACTORS MAINTAINING PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY IN A NEW ENGLAND SALT MARSH , 1999 .

[37]  James B. Grace,et al.  Habitat Partitioning and Competitive Displacement in Cattails (Typha): Experimental Field Studies , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[38]  M. Bertness.  Interspecific Interactions among High Marsh Perennials in a New England Salt Marsh , 1991 .

[39]  A. Underwood,et al.  11. Paradigms, Explanations, and Generalizations in Models for the Structure of Intertidal Communities on Rocky Shores , 1984 .

[40]  S. Ustin,et al.  Effects of salinity on growth and photosynthesis of three California tidal marsh species , 1984, Oecologia.

[41]  A. Snow,et al.  Plant zonation in an Alaskan salt marsh. I: Distribution, abundance and environmental factors , 1984 .

[42]  R. Wiegert,et al.  Tidal salt marshes of the Southeast Atlantic Coast: a community profile , 1990 .

[43]  Anuja Parikh,et al.  Ecology of a mediterranean-climate estuarine wetland at Carpinteria, California: plant distributions and soil salinity in the upper marsh , 1990 .

[44]  I. Ungar.  Salt Tolerance of Plants Growing in Saline Areas of Kansas and Oklahoma , 1966 .

[45]  R. Wiegert,et al.  Productivity Gradients in Salt Marshes: The Response of Spartina Alterniflora to Experimentally Manipulated Soil Water Movement , 1983 .

[46]  M. Bertness.  Zonation of Spartina Patens and Spartina Alterniflora in New England Salt Marsh , 1991 .

[47]  M. Bertness.  The Ecology of a New England Salt Marsh , 1992 .

[48]  R. Marrs,et al.  Influence of environmental factors on the growth and interactions between salt marsh plants: effects of salinity, sediment and waterlogging , 2000 .