ICSSP 2016 – Special Issue Introduction

Many of today's major products and services rely on software to deliver their core capabilities and value. Depending on the product and service, companies have to address a complex array of requirements, regulations, and competitive forces.1 These factors imply different business models and means for developing the software. Highly specified, formal processes, and high assurance quality requirements drive missionand safety-critical projects.2–4 On the other end of the spectrum, managers and developers seek lightweight methods allowing for creativity and rapid development and customer value creation.5,6 Through the years, researchers have supported organizations by creating different development life cycle models, maturity models, processes, best practices, testing approaches, development environments, and so forth. These have all had an impact on the engineering of software. As a result, a number of research questions arise, such as

[1]  Gilbert Regan,et al.  Research Findings from an Industrial Trial of a Traceability Assessment and Implementation Framework , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP).

[2]  Capers Jones Variations in Software Development Practices , 2003, IEEE Softw..

[3]  Rory V. O'Connor,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Situational Context — A Case Study of a Software Development Process for a Microservices Architecture , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP).

[4]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[5]  Binish Tanveer,et al.  Understanding and Improving Effort Estimation in Agile Software Development—An Industrial Case Study , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP).

[6]  M. A. O. Ignacio,et al.  How to cite this article , 2016 .

[7]  Philipp Diebold,et al.  Software Process Models vs. Descriptions: What do Practitioners Use and Need? , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP).

[8]  Marie-Pierre Gervais,et al.  Supporting the Co-adaption of Process Properties , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP).

[9]  Regina Hebig,et al.  How do process and team interaction depend on development technologies?: a case study on a combined setting of model-driven development and classical C coding , 2016, ICSSP.

[10]  Jürgen Münch Software development as an experiment system (keynote) , 2015, ICSSP.

[11]  Charles W. Butler,et al.  Choice of Software Development Methodologies: Do Organizational, Project, and Team Characteristics Matter? , 2016, IEEE Software.

[12]  Kurt Schneider,et al.  Comparing Pre Commit Reviews and Post Commit Reviews Using Process Simulation , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP).

[13]  Rory V. O'Connor,et al.  The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[14]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  Have Agile Techniques been the Silver Bullet for Software Development at Microsoft? , 2013, 2013 ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

[15]  Marco Kuhrmann,et al.  Is Water-Scrum-Fall Reality? On the Use of Agile and Traditional Development Practices , 2015, PROFES.

[16]  Marco Kuhrmann,et al.  Summary of the International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP 2016): [Co-located with ICSE 2016] , 2016, SOEN.

[17]  Kitija Trektere,et al.  Tailoring MDevSPICE® for Mobile Medical Apps , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP).