Understanding the cochlear implant environment by mapping perilymph proteomes from different species

Cochlear implants operate within a bony channel of the cochlea, bathed in a fluid known as the perilymph. The perilymph is a complex fluid containing ions and proteins, which are known to actively interact with metallic electrodes. To improve our understanding of how cochlear implant performance varies in preclinical in vivo studies in comparison to human trials and patient outcomes, the protein composition (or perilymph proteome) is needed. Samples of perilymph were gathered from feline and guinea pig subjects and analyzed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to produce proteomes and compare against the recently published human proteome. Over 64% of the proteins in the guinea pig proteome were found to be common to the human proteome. The proportions of apolipoproteins, enzymes and immunoglobulins showed little variation between the two proteomes, with other classes showing similarity. This establishes a good basis for comparison of results. The results for the feline profile showed less similarity with the human proteome and would not provide a quality comparison. This work highlights the suitability of the guinea pig to model the biological environment of the human cochlear and the need to carefully select models of the biological environment of a cochlear implant to more adequately translate in vitro and in vivo studies to the clinic.

[1]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Implant Surfaces and Interface Processes , 1999, Advances in dental research.

[2]  Andrej Kral,et al.  Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  From Proteins to Proteomes: Large Scale Protein Identification by Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Arnino Acid Analysis , 1996, Bio/Technology.

[4]  I. Thalmann,et al.  Protein profiles of perilymph and endolymph of the guinea pig , 1992, Hearing Research.

[5]  René H Gifford,et al.  Cochlear implantation: current and future device options. , 2012, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[6]  A. Salt,et al.  Perilymph Kinetics of FITC-Dextran Reveals Homeostasis Dominated by the Cochlear Aqueduct and Cerebrospinal Fluid , 2015, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[7]  A. P. Mazzoleni,et al.  Conductivity values of tissue culture medium from 20°C to 40°C , 1986 .

[8]  Jing Zhang Proteomics of human cerebrospinal fluid – the good, the bad, and the ugly , 2007, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[9]  G. Oberascher,et al.  A map of cochlear perilymph protein based on high-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[10]  J M Marston,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. V. The effect of protein on Pt dissolution. , 1980, Biomaterials.

[11]  D. Brynn Hibbert,et al.  Voltammetry of Platinum in Artificial Perilymph Solution , 2001 .

[12]  A. Wise,et al.  An improved cochlear implant electrode array for use in experimental studies , 2011, Hearing Research.

[13]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Proteome of human perilymph. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[14]  H. Saito,et al.  Contributions of domain structure and lipid interaction to the functionality of exchangeable human apolipoproteins. , 2004, Progress in lipid research.

[15]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[16]  Nigel H Lovell,et al.  Substrate dependent stability of conducting polymer coatings on medical electrodes. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[17]  T. Palva,et al.  The total protein of human perilymph. , 1969, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[18]  James E. Evans,et al.  Proteomics analysis of perilymph and cerebrospinal fluid in mouse , 2009, The Laryngoscope.

[19]  Robert Cowan,et al.  Changes in biphasic electrode impedance with protein adsorption and cell growth , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.