Transient increases in choroidal thickness are consistently associated with brief daily visual stimuli that inhibit ocular growth in chicks.

In chickens, transient changes in choroidal thickness are found in conditions in which the eye is slowing its growth in response to visual episodes that prevent excessive elongation. To test the hypothesis that the choroidal and ocular growth responses are linked, we used a variety of "brief daily" stimuli known to ameliorate the development of myopia and assessed the concurrence of the responses. If the hypothesis is true, they should always be correlated. Form deprivation w/vision or strobe. Diffusers were worn for 5 days and removed for 2h of "vision" each day in: (a) one block of 2-h (n=16); or (b) two 1-h periods (n=10). Strobe. Birds were given 0.5h episodes of 12 Hz strobe at dawn and dusk (12h apart, n=11). Negative lenses w/vision or strobe. Lenses (-10D) were worn for 5 days and removed for 2h of vision each day (n=14). Strobe. Same as above (n=11). Darkness/brief vision or myopic defocus. Birds in constant darkness were given 2 daily 0.5h episodes of light 12h apart (n=6) or one daily 0.5h episode of +10D myopic defocus (n=6) for 4 days. Darkness/"frequent" or "infrequent" myopic defocus. Birds in constant darkness were given frequent (2 min x 14) or infrequent (1 min x 7) episodes of +10D myopic defocus for 4 days. In all experiments a control group had the myopia-inducing treatment but did not receive the visual stimulation. High frequency ultrasonography was done at the start and end of the experiment, and on the last day immediately prior to and 1h after the period of stimulation. Refractive errors were measured using a Hartinger's refractometer at the end of the experiment. We found that in 7 of the 8 conditions the development of myopia was inhibited. Form deprivation: vision or strobe vs control: -1.2 and -1.8 vs -9.8D. Negative lenses: vision or strobe vs control: -1.2 and -4.3 vs -8D. Constant dark: vision or myopic defocus vs control: -0.7 and 1.8 vs -1.8D. Constant dark: frequent myopic defocus vs control: 4.8 vs -0.4D (p<0.05 for all comparisons). In all the effect was axial with growth rate being significantly inhibited. In all cases the choroids showed significant transient increases in thickness as well. Form deprivation: vision or strobe vs control: 58 and 15 vs -3 microm. Negative lenses: vision or strobe vs controls: 74 and 17 vs -17 microm. Dark: vision or myopic defocus vs control: 56 and 46 vs 11 microm. Dark: frequent vs control: 103 vs 5 microm. In the "infrequent myopic defocus" condition eyes did not compensate to the defocus, however they did not become myopic. The choroidal response was not significant. These results support the hypothesis that these brief choroidal responses may play a role in ocular growth inhibition.

[1]  D. Nickla,et al.  Inhibiting the transient choroidal thickening response using the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor l-NAME prevents the ameliorative effects of visual experience on ocular growth in two different visual paradigms. , 2006, Experimental eye research.

[2]  H. Wagner,et al.  Release pattern of endogenous dopamine in teleost retinae during light adaptation and pharmacological stimulation , 1989, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Wallman,et al.  Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J Turkel,et al.  Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. , 1978, Science.

[5]  J. Wallman,et al.  Choroidal retinoic acid synthesis: a possible mediator between refractive error and compensatory eye growth. , 2000, Experimental eye research.

[6]  A. Vingrys,et al.  The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Troilo,et al.  The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  E. Melamed,et al.  Effect of postnatal light deprivation on the ontogenesis of dopamine neurons in rat retina. , 1986, Brain research.

[9]  J. Wallman,et al.  Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks , 2002, Vision Research.

[10]  T. Raju,et al.  Levels of dopamine and noradrenaline in the developing retina — effect of light deprivation , 1997, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Laties,et al.  Retinal dopamine and form-deprivation myopia. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Josh Wallman,et al.  Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Troilo,et al.  Change in the synthesis rates of ocular retinoic acid and scleral glycosaminoglycan during experimentally altered eye growth in marmosets. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  S. G. Kramer,et al.  Dopamine: A retinal neurotransmitter. I. Retinal uptake, storage, and light-stimulated release of H3-dopamine in vivo. , 1971, Investigative ophthalmology.

[15]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Observations on the effects of form deprivation on the refractive status of the monkey. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  Lynn Marran,et al.  Moving the retina: Choroidal modulation of refractive state , 1995, Vision Research.

[17]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Visually induced changes in components of the retinoic acid system in fundal layers of the chick. , 2000, Experimental eye research.

[18]  M. Tigges,et al.  Effects of apomorphine, a dopamine receptor agonist, on ocular refraction and axial elongation in a primate model of myopia. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  J. Wallman,et al.  The circadian rhythm in intraocular pressure and its relation to diurnal ocular growth changes in chicks. , 1998, Experimental eye research.

[20]  J. Dowling,et al.  Dopaminergic Mechanisms in the Teleost Retina , 1981, Journal of neurochemistry.

[21]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  6-Hydroxy dopamine does not affect lens-induced refractive errors but suppresses deprivation myopia , 1994, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Neal,et al.  Nitric oxide release is induced by dopamine during illumination of the carp retina: serial neurochemical control of light adaptation , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  J. Sivak,et al.  Retinal dopamine and lens-induced refractive errors in chicks. , 1995, Current eye research.

[24]  T. T. Norton,et al.  Experimental myopia in tree shrews. , 2007, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[25]  C. Wildsoet,et al.  The Effect of the Nonspecific Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor NG-Nitro-l-Arginine Methyl Ester on the Choroidal Compensatory Response to Myopic Defocus in Chickens , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  K. Schmid,et al.  Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks , 1996, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Wallman,et al.  Growth of the two layers of the chick sclera is modulated reciprocally by visual conditions. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  J. Wallman,et al.  Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. , 1998, Experimental eye research.