Influence of size and aggregation on the reactivity of an environmentally and industrially relevant nanomaterial (PbS).

Rarely observed nanoparticle dissolution rate data have been collected and explained for an environmentally and industrially relevant nanomaterial (PbS, the mineral galena) as a function of its particle size and aggregation state using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and solution analysis. Under identical anoxic acidic conditions (pH 3 HCl), it has been determined that the dissolution rate of PbS galena varies by at least 1 order of magnitude simply as a function of particle size, and also due to the aggregation state of the particles (dissolution rates measured are 4.4 x 10(-9) mol m(-2) s(-1) for dispersed 14 nm nanocrystals; 7.7 x 10(-10) mol m(-2) s(-1) for dispersed 3.1 microm microcrystals; and 4.7 x 10(-10) mol m(-2) s(-1) for aggregated 14 nm nanocrystals). The dissolution rate difference between galena microparticles and nanoparticles is due to differences in nanotopography and the crystallographic faces present. Aggregate vs. dispersed dissolution rates are related to transport inhibition in the observed highly confined spaces between densely packed, aggregated nanocrystals, where self-diffusion coefficients of water and ions decrease dramatically. This study shows that factors at the nanometer scale significantly influence the release rate of aqueous, highly toxic and bioavailable Pb in natural or industrial environments during galena dissolution.

[1]  Karluss Thomas,et al.  Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part V: role of dissolution in biological fate and effects of nanoscale particles. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  Kiril Hristovski,et al.  Stability of commercial metal oxide nanoparticles in water. , 2008, Water research.

[3]  Jamie R. Lead,et al.  Aquatic Colloids and Nanoparticles: Current Knowledge and Future Trends , 2006 .

[4]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Stable cluster formation in aqueous suspensions of iron oxyhydroxide nanoparticles. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[5]  Peter J Vikesland,et al.  Particle size and aggregation effects on magnetite reactivity toward carbon tetrachloride. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Michael F. Hochella,et al.  Nanogeoscience: From Origins to Cutting-Edge Applications , 2008 .

[7]  J. Banfield,et al.  Chemical weathering of silicates in nature; a microscopic perspective with theoretical considerations , 1995 .

[8]  Takehiko Kitamori,et al.  NMR study of water molecules confined in extended nanospaces. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  Michael F. Hochella,et al.  The non-oxidative dissolution of galena nanocrystals: Insights into mineral dissolution rates as a function of grain size, shape, and aggregation state , 2008 .

[10]  R. Müller,et al.  Nanosuspensions as particulate drug formulations in therapy. Rationale for development and what we can expect for the future. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[11]  P. Alvarez,et al.  Mechanisms of photochemistry and reactive oxygen production by fullerene suspensions in water. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  T. Hyeon,et al.  Generalized and facile synthesis of semiconducting metal sulfide nanocrystals. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Chongxuan Liu,et al.  Molecular simulations of water and ion diffusion in nanosized mineral fractures. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  I. Chernyshova,et al.  Size-dependent structural transformations of hematite nanoparticles. 1. Phase transition. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[15]  A. S. Madden,et al.  A test of geochemical reactivity as a function of mineral size: Manganese oxidation promoted by hematite nanoparticles , 2005 .

[16]  Takehiko Kitamori,et al.  Nanochannels on a fused-silica microchip and liquid properties investigation by time-resolved fluorescence measurements. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  J. Banfield,et al.  Water-driven structure transformation in nanoparticles at room temperature , 2003, Nature.

[19]  P. Fenter,et al.  Mineral–water interfacial structures revealed by synchrotron X-ray scattering , 2004 .

[20]  G. H. Nancollas,et al.  Size-effects in the dissolution of hydroxyapatite: an understanding of biological demineralization , 2004 .

[21]  G. Waychunas,et al.  Structure, chemistry, and properties of mineral nanoparticles , 2008 .

[22]  Xian‐Wen Wei,et al.  Hydrothermal preparation of PbS crystals and shape evolution , 2007 .

[23]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Influence of Size on Reductive Dissolution of Six-Line Ferrihydrite , 2008 .

[24]  Eric A. Meulenkamp,et al.  Size Dependence of the Dissolution of ZnO Nanoparticles , 1998 .

[25]  P. Schjønning,et al.  Tortuosity, diffusivity, and permeability in the soil liquid and gaseous phases , 2001 .

[26]  David M. Cwiertny,et al.  Interpreting nanoscale size-effects in aggregated Fe-oxide suspensions: Reaction of Fe(II) with Goethite , 2008 .

[27]  D. Sparks,et al.  Nanominerals, Mineral Nanoparticles, and Earth Systems , 2008, Science.

[28]  Jochen Schmidt,et al.  Dissolution kinetics of oxidic nanoparticles: The observation of an unusual behaviour , 2008 .

[29]  M. Hochella,et al.  Scanning Tunneling Microscopy of Galena (100) Surface Oxidation and Sorption of Aqueous Gold , 1991, Science.