Regulation of grasping forces during bimanual in-phase and anti-phase coordination

When a hand-held object is moved, grip force is adapted in an anticipatory manner to load force due to a dynamic coupling between both forces. The present study addressed the issue of grip-load force regulation when moving rhythmically two hand-held objects in the vertical dimension, and more specifically the divergence of force control when performing according to the in-phase versus anti-phase mode. Results revealed that grip-load force ratio profiles were similar in both bimanual conditions. That is, force ratio was not constant throughout the movement cycles but followed a fairly regular pattern with maxima and minima, attained at upward and downward hand positions, respectively. However, anti-phase patterns showed an increased maximum grip-load force ratio as compared to in-phase patterns, whereas the latter did not differ from unimanual movements. The magnification of maximum force ratio during anti-phase movements suggests that rescaling occurred. This is likely due to the complexity of the anti-phase mode that necessitates increased monitoring and attention relative to the other performance conditions, creating a coordinative situation that imposes an additional degree of uncertainty. Therefore, the safety margin is amplified during anti-phase movements, probably as a strategy to prevent a potential destabilization of the grip during an asymmetrical load condition. Accordingly, these findings also demonstrate that grip-load force regulation is more proficiently controlled during bimanual in-phase than anti-phase movements. Herewith, the data add content to earlier work illustrating kinematic dissimilarities between both coordination modes.

[1]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  Grip force adjustments induced by predictable load perturbations during a manipulative task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  N. Sadato,et al.  Role of the Supplementary Motor Area and the Right Premotor Cortex in the Coordination of Bimanual Finger Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Egocentric and Allocentric Constraints in the Expression of Patterns of Interlimb Coordination , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Gabriel Leonard,et al.  Performance on unimanual and bimanual tapping tasks by patients with lesions of the frontal or temporal lobe , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  Attentional load associated with performing and stabilizing preferred bimanual patterns , 1999 .

[6]  S. Glasauer,et al.  Moving weightless objects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  J. Kelso Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  Robert F. Port,et al.  MIND IN MOTION: , 2019, Dune.

[9]  J. Marshall,et al.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  I. Jenkins,et al.  Cerebral control of unimanual and bimanual movements: an H215O PET study , 1998, Neuroreport.

[11]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Variability and Motor Control , 1993 .

[12]  K. Zilles,et al.  The role of ventral medial wall motor areas in bimanual co-ordination. A combined lesion and activation study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  J A Kelso,et al.  Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. , 1988, Science.

[14]  Howard N. Zelaznik,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1996 .

[15]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Some dynamical themes in perception and action , 1996 .

[16]  Geert J. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF COORDINATION IN INFANCY , 1993 .

[17]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  Chapter 5 Concepts and Methods for A Dynamical Approach to Behavioral Coordination and Change , 1993 .

[18]  Roland S. Johansson,et al.  Sensory Control of Dexterous Manipulation in Humans , 1996 .