Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation.

Background Formulaic expressions, including idioms and other fixed expressions, comprise a significant proportion of discourse. Although much has been written about this topic, controversy remains about their psychological status. An important claim about formulaic expressions, that they are known to native speakers, has seldom been directly demonstrated. This study tested the hypothesis that formulaic expressions are known and stored as whole unit mental representations by performing three perceptual experiments. Method Listeners transcribed two kinds of spectrally-degraded spoken sentences, half formulaic, and half novel, newly created expressions, matched for grammar and length. Two familiarity ratings, usage and exposure, were obtained from listeners for each expression. Text frequency data for the stimuli and their constituent words were obtained using a spoken corpus. Results Participants transcribed formulaic more successfully than literal utterances. Usage and familiarity ratings correlated with accuracy, but formulaic utterances with low ratings were also transcribed correctly. Phrase types differed significantly in text frequency, but word frequency counts did not differentiate the two kinds of expressions. Discussion These studies provide new converging evidence that formulaic expressions are encoded and processed as whole units, supporting a dual-process model of language processing, which assumes that grammatical and formulaic expressions are differentially processed.

[1]  F. Meunier.  Formulaic Language and Language Teaching , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[2]  John J Sidtis,et al.  The formulaic schema in the minds of two generations of native speakers. , 2015, Ampersand.

[3]  P. Lieberman.  Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[4]  Simone Sprenger,et al.  Slipping on superlemmas: Multiword lexical items in speech production , 2007 .

[5]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceptual wholes can reduce the conscious accessibility of their parts , 2012, Cognition.

[6]  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis,et al.  Tapping into neural resources of communication: formulaic language in aphasia therapy , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Sieb Nooteboom,et al.  Self-monitoring for speech errors in novel phrases and phrasal lexical items , 2011 .

[8]  Lawrence C. Sager,et al.  Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Alison Wray,et al.  The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model , 2000 .

[10]  K Bock,et al.  That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blendsß , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[11]  C. Westbury,et al.  Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. , 2011 .

[12]  C. Fillmore.  5 – On Fluency , 1979 .

[13]  Svenja Adolphs,et al.  Sound Evidence: Phraseological Units in Spoken Corpora , 2009 .

[14]  Howard R. Pollio,et al.  Patterns of figurative language competence in adult speakers , 1979 .

[15]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain damage , 1999 .

[16]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions , 1999 .

[17]  Gary Libben,et al.  Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1999, Brain and Language.

[18]  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis,et al.  Two-Track Mind: Formulaic and Novel Language Support a Dual-Process Model , 2012 .

[19]  D. Vanlancker-Sidtis.  Auditory recognition of idioms by native and nonnative speakers of English: It takes one to know one , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[20]  P. Tabossi,et al.  The comprehension of idioms. , 1988 .

[21]  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis,et al.  The perceptual and acoustic characteristics of Korean idiomatic and literal sentences , 2015 .

[22]  Kirsten R. Butcher,et al.  Processing of Idiomatic Expressions: Evidence for a New Hybrid View , 2007 .

[23]  R. Gibbs.  Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Sylviane Granger,et al.  Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[25]  Douglas Biber,et al.  A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: multi-word patterns in speech and writing , 2009 .

[26]  D. Sidtis.  Formulaic Language and Language Disorders , 2012 .

[27]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Formulaic Language and Second Language Acquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[28]  Anthony P. Cowie.  Multiword Lexical Units and Communicative Language Teaching , 1992 .

[29]  D. Pisoni.  Word Identification in Noise. , 1996, Language and cognitive processes.

[30]  W. A. Bousfield.  The Occurrence of Clustering in the Recall of Randomly Arranged Associates , 1953 .

[31]  Nicholas Groom.  Effects of Second Language Immersion on Second Language Collocational Development , 2009 .

[32]  Koenraad Kuiper.  Knowledge of language and phrasal vocabulary acquisition , 2006 .

[33]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Sequencing in SLA , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[34]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[35]  M F Dorman,et al.  The Identification of Consonants and Vowels by Cochlear Implant Patients Using a 6‐Channel Continuous Interleaved Sampling Processor and by Normal‐Hearing Subjects Using Simulations of Processors with Two to Nine Channels , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[36]  Nancy Bell.  Formulaic Language, Creativity, and Language Play in a Second Language , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[37]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases , 2006 .

[38]  D. D. Greenwood.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  W. James.  The knowing of things together. , 1895 .

[40]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  Salience of the word as a unit in the perception of language , 1974 .

[41]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[42]  Nan Jiang,et al.  The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. , 2007 .

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The access and processing of idiomatic expressions , 1979 .

[44]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[45]  Dušica Filipović Đurđević,et al.  An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. , 2011, Psychological review.

[46]  G. Underwood,et al.  The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences , 2004 .

[47]  Sandra Weintraub,et al.  The acquisition of routines in child language , 1976, Language in Society.

[48]  Britt Erman,et al.  Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle , 2007 .

[49]  M. Ashby.  Prosody and idioms in English , 2006 .

[50]  P. Tabossi,et al.  Why are idioms recognized fast? , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[51]  D. V. van Lancker,et al.  Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: acoustic and phonetic cues. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[52]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers , 2011 .

[54]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Formulaic Sequences: Are They Processed More Quickly than Nonformulaic Language by Native and Nonnative Speakers? , 2008 .

[55]  J. Gleason.  The Acquisition of Social Speech Routines and Politeness Formulas11This research was supported by Grant BNS 75–21909 A01 from the National Science Foundation. , 1980 .

[56]  D. Titone,et al.  The multidetermined nature of idiom processing , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[57]  C M Connine,et al.  Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: effects of predictability and literality. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Leon Manelis,et al.  Recognition and Cued Recall of Idioms and Phrases. , 1973 .

[59]  Affect and accuracy in recall: Do flashbulb memories differ from other types of emotional memories? , 1992 .

[60]  Diana Van Lancker-Sidtis,et al.  Tracking the incidence of formulaic expressions in everyday speech: methods for classification and verification , 2004 .

[61]  Neil Millar,et al.  The Processing of Malformed Formulaic Language , 2011 .