Transforming LSA space dimensions into a rubric for an automatic assessment and feedback system

We model how to implement a rubric in latent semantic analysis.The proposed method change abstract dimensions into meaningful dimensions.The method allows to detect easily written contents.Inbuilt rubric method has been used to give feedback to 924 university students. The purpose of this article is to validate, through two empirical studies, a new method for automatic evaluation of written texts, called Inbuilt Rubric, based on the Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) technique, which constitutes an innovative and distinct turn with respect to LSA application so far. In the first empirical study, evidence of the validity of the method to identify and evaluate the conceptual axes of a text in a sample of 78 summaries by secondary school students is sought. Results show that the proposed method has a significantly higher degree of reliability than classic LSA methods of text evaluation, and displays very high sensitivity to identify which conceptual axes are included or not in each summary. A second study evaluates the method's capacity to interact and provide feedback about quality in a real online system on a sample of 924 discursive texts written by university students. Results show that students improved the quality of their written texts using this system, and also rated the experience very highly. The final conclusion is that this new method opens a very interesting way regarding the role of automatic assessors in the identification of presence/absence and quality of elaboration of relevant conceptual information in texts written by students with lower time costs than the usual LSA-based methods.

[1]  William M. Pottenger,et al.  A framework for understanding Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) performance , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Computational Methods to Extract Meaning From Text and Advance Theories of Human Cognition , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[3]  J. Hayes,et al.  Writing Research and the Writer. , 1986 .

[4]  Joseph P Magliano,et al.  Computer-based assessment of student-constructed responses , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[5]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Handbook of latent semantic analysis , 2007 .

[6]  Angelo Kyrilov,et al.  Automated assessment of short free-text responses in computer science using latent semantic analysis , 2011, ITiCSE '11.

[7]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Best practices in writing instruction , 2007 .

[8]  A. McNeil,et al.  Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Approach , 2007 .

[9]  Stephen P. Balfour,et al.  Assessing Writing in MOOCs: Automated Essay Scoring and Calibrated Peer Review™. , 2013 .

[10]  Antonio Pardo Merino,et al.  Análisis de datos en ciencias sociales y de la salud III , 2009 .

[11]  E. Sutinen,et al.  Automatic assessment of the content of essays based on course materials , 2004, ITRE 2004. 2nd International Conference Information Technology: Research and Education.

[12]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Supporting Content-Based Feedback in On-Line Writing Evaluation with LSA , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[13]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Using Latent Semantic Analysis to Evaluate the Contributions of Students in AutoTutor , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[14]  Jill Fitzgerald,et al.  Research on Revision in Writing , 1987 .

[15]  Phillipe Dessus,et al.  APex, un système d'aide à la préparation d'examens , 1999 .

[16]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Developing Summarization Skills through the Use of LSA-Based Feedback , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[17]  Lucian L. Visinescu,et al.  Orthogonal rotations in latent semantic analysis: An empirical study , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Sharon Pianko,et al.  A Description of the Composing Processes of College Freshman Writers. , 1979 .

[19]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Linear algebra, a concrete introduction , 1982 .

[21]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[22]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Strengths, Limitations, and Extensions of LSA , 2007 .

[23]  Stephen G. Pulman,et al.  What is my essay really saying? Using extractive summarization to motivate reflection and redrafting , 2013, AIED Workshops.

[24]  Jill Burstein,et al.  Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation Current Applications and New Directions , 2018 .

[25]  Nicholas Dronen,et al.  Effective Sampling for Large-scale Automated Writing Evaluation Systems , 2014, L@S.

[26]  G. Heath Writing , 1971, Veterinary Record.

[27]  Ricardo Olmos,et al.  Transforming Selected Concepts Into Dimensions in Latent Semantic Analysis , 2014 .

[28]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring: Applications to Educational Technology , 1999 .

[29]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[30]  T. Keith,et al.  Trait Ratings for Automated Essay Grading , 2002 .

[31]  Scott Dooley,et al.  Summary Street®: Computer Support for Comprehension and Writing , 2005 .

[32]  Patrick F. Reidy An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis , 2009 .

[33]  Preslav Nakov,et al.  Weight functions impact on LSA performance , 2001 .

[34]  Marian Petre,et al.  Seeing the Whole Picture: Comparing Computer Assisted Assessment Systems using LSA-based Systems as an Example , 2007 .

[35]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Assessing and Improving Comprehension With Latent Semantic Analysis , 2007 .

[36]  Beata Beigman Klebanov,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring , 2021, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies.

[37]  Guillermo Jorge-Botana Gallito 2 . 0 : a Natural Language Processing tool to support Research on Discourse , 2013 .

[38]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology , 1999 .

[39]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Implementation and Applications of the Intelligent Essay Assessor , 2013 .

[40]  M. Rayhan Ahmed Mithu,et al.  Automated short answer scoring , 2016 .