The Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale: A Study on Interobserver Reliability.

OBJECTIVES The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is inadequate for non-toilet trained children. The Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale (BITSS) was developed, consisting of 7 photographs of diapers containing stools of infants and toddlers. We aimed to evaluate interobserver reliability of stool consistency assessment among parents, nurses, and medical doctors (MDs) using the BITSS. METHODS In this multicenter cross-sectional study (2016-2017), BITSS photographs were rated according to the BSFS. The reliability of the BITSS was evaluated using the overall proportion of perfect agreement and the linearly weighted κ statistic. RESULTS A total of 2462 observers participated: 1181 parents (48.0%), 624 nurses (25.3%), and 657 MDs (26.7%). The best-performing BITSS photographs corresponded with BSFS type 7 (87.5%) and type 4 (87.6%), followed by the BITSS photographs representing BSFS type 6 (75.0%), BSFS type 5 (68.0%), BSFS type 1 (64.8%), and BSFS type 3 (64.6%). The weakest performing BITSS photograph corresponded with BSFS type 2 (49.7%). The overall weighted κ-value was 0.72 (95% CI 0.59-0.85; good agreement). Based on these results, photographs were categorized per stool group as hard (BSFS type 1-3), formed (BSFS type 4), loose (BSFS types 5 and 6), or watery (BSFS type 7) stools. According to this new categorization system, correct allocation for each photograph ranged from 83 to 96% (average: 90%). The overall proportion of correct allocations was 72.8%. CONCLUSIONS BITSS showed good agreement with BSFS. Using the newly categorized BITSS photographs, the BITSS is reliable for the assessment of stools of non-toilet trained children in clinical practice and research. A multilanguage translated version of the BITSS can be downloaded at https://bitss-stoolscale.com/.

[1]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Assessing Children's Report of Stool Consistency: Agreement Between the Pediatric Rome III Questionnaire and the Bristol Stool Scale , 2017, The Journal of pediatrics.

[2]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Development of the Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale (‘BITSS’): protocol of the study , 2017, BMJ Open.

[3]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Recommendations for pharmacological clinical trials in children with irritable bowel syndrome: the Rome foundation pediatric subcommittee on clinical trials , 2016, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[4]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Using the Bristol Stool Scale and Parental Report of Stool Consistency as Part of the Rome III Criteria for Functional Constipation in Infants and Toddlers. , 2016, The Journal of pediatrics.

[5]  M. Benninga,et al.  Reporting on Outcome Measures of Functional Constipation in Children—A Systematic Review , 2016, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[6]  M. Benninga,et al.  Reporting Outcome Measures of Functional Constipation in Children From 0 to 4 Years of Age , 2015, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[7]  M. Benninga,et al.  Amsterdam infant stool scale is more useful for assessing children who have not been toilet trained than Bristol stool scale , 2014, Acta paediatrica.

[8]  J. Reitsma,et al.  Infant stool form scale: development and results. , 2009, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  M. Benninga,et al.  Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Neonate/Toddler. , 2016, Gastroenterology.

[10]  M. Fisher.  FUNCTIONAL DISORDERS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS , 2003 .

[11]  S. Lewis,et al.  Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.