Urban designers fail to design high quality environments either because of economical constraints or educational limitation. This study aims to compare physical environmental quality and education system in two countries, Palestine and Turkey. The quantity of design education departments in each country, the course contents in each department, the quantity and profession of instructors in each department, presence of a course related to environment and behaviour studies or design theories were compared. What needs to be improved in design education to create better environments is discussed as well as the directions for future studies. © 2016. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creative commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. Keywords: Urban design, environmental aesthetics, environmental quality
[1]
Robert W. Marans,et al.
Methods in environmental and behavioral research
,
1987
.
[2]
John Habraken.
Questions that will not Go Away: Some Remarks on Long-Term Trends in Architecture and their Impact on Architectural Education
,
2004
.
[3]
Ashraf M. Salama,et al.
DELIVERING THEORY COURSES IN ARCHITECTURE: INQUIRY-BASED, ACTIVE, AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING INTEGRATED
,
2010
.
[4]
V. Noreika,et al.
Environmental Psychology
,
2018
.
[5]
Robert B. Bechtel,et al.
Handbook of environmental psychology
,
2002
.