Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the first-year field test BSCS middle school science program on student understanding of the creative, developmental, testable, and unified nature of science. The experimental group, which was exposed to the BSCS program, and the control group, which was taught using a more traditional middle school science curriculum, were administered a pretest and posttest using the Modified Nature of Scientific Knowledge Scale (MNSKS). Analyses of the results showed that the understanding of students who experienced the BSCS science program decreased significantly in regard to the developmental and testable nature of science. The understanding of students who experienced the control-group science program decreased significantly in regard to the creative nature of science. Analyses of covariance indicated that students in the control group possessed a significantly better understanding of the testable nature of science than did students who used the BSCS science program. Implications of these results are related to the constructivist view of learning, the development of curricula designed to facilitate scientific literacy, and future research endeavors.

[1]  Irvin J. Lehmann,et al.  Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology , 1973 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  J. Kelly Science for All Americans (A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology) American Association for the Advancement of Science , 1990 .

[4]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? , 1987 .

[5]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , 1978 .

[6]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[7]  Charles H. Heimler,et al.  Focus on Physical Science , 1952 .

[8]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Children's science and its consequences for teaching , 1982 .

[9]  J. Stevens Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[10]  Stanley L. Helgeson Trends and Issues in Science Education. , 1992 .

[11]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Classroom factors related to changes in students' conceptions of the nature of science , 1985 .

[12]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[13]  Thomas R. Koballa,et al.  Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skills , 2005 .

[14]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  A Study of Two Misconceptions About the Nature Of Science Among Junior High School Students , 1981 .

[15]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Psychology of the Child , 1969 .