Effects of uneven-aged silviculture on the stand structure, species composition, and economic returns of loblolly pine stands

Abstract Uneven-aged silviculture in loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) stands has many economic and ecological benefits. Here, the consequences of various uneven-aged management regimes are predicted with the SouthPro simulator. Results indicate that target distributions for pines with residual merchantable basal areas of ≈12.5 m 2  ha −1 , maximum diameters of ca. 40 cm, and q -ratios of 1.2–1.25 for 2.5 cm DBH classes are likely to provide high economic returns on good sites when combined with hardwood control. Increasing this maximum diameter would enhance tree-size diversity, but reduce sawtimber production and profits. Retaining a hardwood component with 1.15–2.3 m 2  ha −1 of basal area could enhance tree-species diversity, but this too would result in moderate reductions in income. Insisting on maximizing tree-size diversity or tree-species diversity among softwoods, soft hardwood, and hard hardwoods would be quite costly in terms of lost income and production. Results also illustrate how short-term economic incentives can lead to high-grading practices, despite substantial reductions in stand productivity and net returns in the long term.

[1]  J. Buongiorno,et al.  Tree Diversity, Landscape Diversity, and Economics of Maple-Birch Forests: Implications of Markovian Models , 1998 .

[2]  P. A. Murphy,et al.  Interim Models for Basal Area and Volume Projection of Uneven-Aged Loblolly-Shortleaf Pine Stands , 1982 .

[3]  R. Reynolds.  Twenty-nine years of selection timber management on the Crossett Experimental Forest. , 1969 .

[4]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  A multi-species, density-dependent matrix growth model to predict tree diversity and income in northern hardwood stands , 1996 .

[5]  H. Williston.  Uneven-Aged Management in the Loblolly-Shortleaf Pine Type , 1978 .

[6]  K. Skog,et al.  Growth model for uneven-aged loblolly pine stands : simulations and management implications , 1998 .

[7]  William F. Watson,et al.  Costs and cost trends for forestry practices in the South , 1987 .

[8]  Douglas R. Phillips,et al.  Pine-Hardwood Mixtures—A New Concept in Regeneration , 1987 .

[9]  R. D. Ohmart,et al.  Comparison of the importance of different habitat attributes to avian community organization , 1984 .

[10]  S. A. Temple,et al.  Area-Dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin Forests , 1983 .

[11]  C. Oliver.  Forest development in North America following major disturbances , 1980 .

[12]  T. W. Bowersox.  The Practice of Silviculture—Applied Forest Ecology, Ninth Edition , 1997, Forest Science.

[13]  P. A. Murphy,et al.  Growth and Yield Following Four Reproduction Cutting Methods in Loblolly-Shortleaf Pine Stands--A Case Study , 1982 .

[14]  M. Willson,et al.  Avian Community Organization and Habitat Structure , 1974 .

[15]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Wildlife, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity , 1989 .

[16]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Long- and short-term effects of alternative cutting regimes on economic returns and ecological diversity in mixed-species forests , 1993 .

[17]  J. B. Baker.  The Crossett Farm Forestry Forties After 41 Years of Selection Management , 1986 .

[18]  J. Guldin.  The Role of Uneven-Aged Silviculture in the Context of Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[19]  B. Stokes,et al.  Assessment of costs and impacts for alternative harvesting methods in mixed stands , 1993 .

[20]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Effects of alternative management regimes on forest stand structure, species composition, and income: a model for the Italian Dolomites , 1996 .

[21]  Paul A. Murphy,et al.  Uneven-Aged Silviculture for the Loblolly and Shortleaf Pine Forest Cover Types , 1996 .

[22]  O. G. Langdon.  Natural Regeneration of Loblolly Pine: A Sound Strategy for Many Forest Landowners , 1981 .

[23]  K. Franzreb.  TREE SPECIES USED BY BIRDS IN LOGGED AND UNLOGGED MIXED-CONIFEROUS FORESTS , 1978 .

[24]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The Crossett Story: The Beginning of Forestry in Southern Arkansas and Northern Louisiana , 1980 .

[25]  A. Magurran.  Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[26]  S. Chang.  Determination of the Optimal Growing Stock and Cutting Cycle for an Uneven-Aged Stand , 1981 .

[27]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Removal intensity and tree size effects on harvesting cost and profitability , 1997 .

[28]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Microhabitat Pattern and the Structure of Forest Bird Communities , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[29]  Martin L. Cody,et al.  Habitat selection in birds , 1986 .

[30]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Productivity and Costs of Three Harvesting Methods , 1994 .

[31]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY IN MANAGED FORESTS : LESSONS FROM NATURAL FORESTS , 1991 .

[32]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  Forest resources of the United States, 1992. , 1993 .

[33]  Thomas A. Waldrop.  Proceedings of Pine-Hardwood Mixtures: A Symposium on Management and Ecology of the Type , 1989 .

[34]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Tree Size Diversity and Economic Returns in Uneven-Aged Forest Stands , 1994 .

[35]  P. Burton,et al.  The value of managing for biodiversity , 1992 .

[36]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  The 1993 RPA timber assessment update , 1995 .

[37]  R. M. Farrar,et al.  Optimum Management Regimes for Uneven-Aged Loblolly-Shortleaf Pine Stands Managed Under the Selection System in the West Gulf Region , 1989 .

[38]  R. Reynolds.  Eighteen Years of Selection Timber Management on the Crossett Experimental Forest , 1959 .

[39]  G. Likens,et al.  Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. , 1979 .

[40]  Terry F. Strong,et al.  Economic and tree diversity trade-offs in managed northern hardwoods , 1992 .

[41]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[42]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .