First Interaction Network of Sarcosaprophagous Fauna (Acari and Insecta) Associated with Animal Remains in a Mediterranean Region (Northern Spain)

Simple Summary Forensic entomology applies the knowledge of arthropods to obtain useful information for the resolution of forensic investigations. In legal medicine, one of the methods used for the dating of death is the faunal succession, which is based on the orderly and predictable changes of the species associated with a corpse over time. The potential of insects for this purpose has been known for more than seven centuries, but mites are only currently being incorporated. Mites can provide useful information on the time and place of death because: they are a very diverse group, ubiquitous, abundant, and frequent; they contribute to the faunal succession; they are indicators of location and transfer of the corpse; they can be present in unfavorable conditions or environments for insects; they complement the information obtained from insects; and they are tracking evidence. Due to the absence of knowledge regarding the sarcosaprophagous fauna in the Mediterranean region, it is necessary to highlight the diversity of insects, together with their phoretic mites, present in decomposing animal organic matter, and their interaction network in this region, in order that the results obtained can be applied in future forensic investigations and contribute to the estimation of the time and place of death. Abstract The potential of insects for forensic investigations has been known for more than 700 years. However, arthropods such as mites could also play a role in these investigations. The information obtained from insects, together with their phoretic mites, is of special interest in terms of estimating the time and geographical location of death. This paper presents the first interaction network between phoretic mites and their host insects in Navarra. It also reports the first time that an interaction network was applied to animal remains of forensic relevance. The data reveal the degrees of specificity of the interactions established, the biological and ecological characteristics of the mites at the time of association, and factors that played important roles in the mites’ dispersion. Fauna was collected using 657 traps baited with 20 g of pig carrion over a year. Only 0.6% of insects collected carried phoretic mites. The network comprised 312 insects (275 beetles, 37 flies) and 1533 mites and was analyzed using various packages of the R programming language. We contribute new host insect records for 15 mites, 3 new records of insects as hosts, 5 new mite records for the Iberian Peninsula, and 2 new mites records and 8 new insect records for Navarra.

[1]  M. -,et al.  The genus Uroseius Berlese (Acari: Mesostigmata: Uropodina: Trachytidae) in the Iberian Peninsula with description of a new species associated with animal remains , 2019, Systematic and Applied Acarology.

[2]  M. I. Saloña-Bordas,et al.  Gamasina Mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) Associated with Animal Remains in the Mediterranean Region of Navarra (Northern Spain) , 2019, Insects.

[3]  S. Choudhary,et al.  Forensic Entomology: Insect clock , 2018 .

[4]  J. D. de Roode,et al.  Phoresy , 2017, Current Biology.

[5]  R. Kilner,et al.  Interspecific Interactions and the Scope for Parent-Offspring Conflict: High Mite Density Temporarily Changes the Trade-Off between Offspring Size and Number in the Burying Beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides , 2016, PloS one.

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  K. Okabe Ecological characteristics of insects that affect symbiotic relationships with mites , 2013 .

[8]  BajerleinD.,et al.  When a beetle is too small to carry phoretic mites? A case of hydrophilid beetles (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) and Uropoda orbicularis (Acari: Mesostigmata) , 2012 .

[9]  H. N. Açıkgöz,et al.  Role of acari in forensic medicine , 2012 .

[10]  Aly H. Rasmy,et al.  The humans lie but the spiders do not lie: An overview on forensic acarology , 2011 .

[11]  M. Arbabi,et al.  Mesostigmatic Mites Associated with Coleoptera and Biodiversity Calculation of These Mites Phoretic on Dung Beetles in Golestan Province (North of Iran) , 2011 .

[12]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks , 2011 .

[13]  M. Villet Forensic Entomology: The Utility of Arthropods in Legal Investigations , 2010 .

[14]  P. Mašán,et al.  Review of the European genera of Eviphididae (Acari: Mesostigmata) and the species occurring in Slovakia. , 2010 .

[15]  T. E. Huntington,et al.  Introduction: Perceptions and Status of Forensic Entomology , 2009 .

[16]  K. L. Kreitlow Insect Succession in a Natural Environment , 2009 .

[17]  H. Braig,et al.  Carcases and mites , 2009, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[18]  B. Turner,et al.  Forensic acarology: an introduction , 2009, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[19]  B. OConnor Astigmatid mites (Acari: Sarcoptiformes) of forensic interest , 2009, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[20]  H. Braig,et al.  Phoretic mites associated with animal and human decomposition , 2009, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[21]  C. Desch Human hair follicle mites and forensic acarology , 2009, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[22]  B. Turner Forensic entomology: a template for forensic acarology? , 2009, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[23]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[24]  M. L. Goff,et al.  Phoretic Mites and Carcasses: Acari Transported by Organisms Associated with Animal and Human Decomposition , 2009 .

[25]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks , 2008 .

[26]  A. Rasmy Forensic Acarology: A New Area for Forensic Investigation , 2007 .

[27]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Specialization, Constraints, and Conflicting Interests in Mutualistic Networks , 2007, Current Biology.

[28]  A. Gómez-Gómez,et al.  La Entomología Forense en España: pasado, presente y perspectivas de futuro , 2007 .

[29]  Carlo P. Campobasso,et al.  Best practice in forensic entomology—standards and guidelines , 2007, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[30]  N. Haskell,et al.  Recreating Death's Acre in the School Yard: Using Pig Carcasses as Model Corpses, to Teach Concepts of Forensic Entomology & Ecological Succession , 2006 .

[31]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[32]  N. Haskell,et al.  RECREATING DEATH'S ACRE IN THE SCHOOL YARD: Using Pig Carcasses as Model Corpses To Teach Concepts of Forensic Entomology & Ecological Succession , 2006 .

[33]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[34]  Josef K. Müller,et al.  The dispersal behaviour of the phoretic mite Poecilochirus carabi (Mesostigmata, Parasitidae): adaptation to the breeding biology of its carrier Necrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera, Silphidae) , 1992, Oecologia.

[35]  H. Proctor,et al.  Mites: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour , 1999 .

[36]  M. Starrach,et al.  Host specificity and permanence of associations between mesostigmatic mites (Acari: Anactinotrichida) and burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorus) , 1998 .

[37]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Network analysis of 2-mode data , 1997 .

[38]  G. Anderson,et al.  Initial studies on insect succession on carrion in Southwestern British Columbia , 1996 .

[39]  F. Athias-Binche Phenotypic plasticity, polymorphisms in variable environments and some evolutionary consequences in phoretic mites (Acarina) : A review , 1995 .

[40]  D. Wilson,et al.  Poecilochirus carabi: Behavioral and Life-History Adaptations to Different Hosts and the Consequences of Geographical Shifts in Host Communities , 1994 .

[41]  F. Athias-Binche Dispersal in varying environments: the case of phoretic uropodid mites , 1993 .

[42]  M. L. Goff,et al.  Forensic entomology in criminal investigations. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[43]  S. Zoia Segnalazioni faunistiche italiane , 1991 .

[44]  V. Kashyap,et al.  Efficacy of entomological method in estimation of postmortem interval: a comparative analysis. , 1989, Forensic science international.

[45]  S. Morand Agrégation et régulation dans les systèmes hôtes-parasites: exemple des Nématodes parasites de l'escargot Helix aspersa , 1989 .

[46]  W. Karg Acari (Acarina), Milben, Unterordnung Parasitiformes (Anactinochaeta), Uropodina Kramer, Schildkrötenmilben , 1989 .

[47]  P. E. Hunter,et al.  Associations of Mesostigmata with Other Arthropods , 1988 .

[48]  K. H. Hyatt,et al.  A review of the Macrochelidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) of the British Isles , 1988 .

[49]  Kenneth G. V. Smith A manual of forensic entomology , 1988 .

[50]  B. Keh Scope and applications of forensic entomology. , 1985, Annual review of entomology.

[51]  T. Koelmeyer,et al.  Insects Associated with Exposed Human Corpses in Auckland, New Zealand , 1984, Medicine, science, and the law.

[52]  Y. Z. Erzinçllioğlu The Application of Entomology to Forensic Medicine , 1983 .

[53]  Y. Z. Erzinçlioğlu The application of entomology to forensic medicine. , 1983, Medicine, science, and the law.

[54]  E. Binns PHORESY AS MIGRATION ‐ SOME FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OF PHORESY IN MITES , 1982 .

[55]  K. H. Hyatt Mites of the subfamily Parasitinae (Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) in the British Isles , 1980 .

[56]  G. Evans Adults of the genus Crassicheles Karg (Acari: Mesostigmata) , 1980 .

[57]  William D. McEnroe,et al.  A Manual of Acarology , 1978 .

[58]  J. Witcosky,et al.  VARIATION IN SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE ATTACK HEIGHT ASSOCIATED WITH PHORETIC UROPODID MITES , 1978, The Canadian Entomologist.

[59]  R. Axtell,et al.  Phoresy redefined and examined in Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acarina:Macrochelidae) , 1971 .

[60]  G. Halffter,et al.  The natural history of dung beetles. A supplement on associated biota. , 1971, Revista latinoamericana de microbiologia.

[61]  R. Mitchell An Analysis of Dispersal in Mites , 1970, The American Naturalist.