Long-term Clinical Outcome of Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy (TUMT) 1991-1999 at Karolinska Hospital, Sweden

Objective: Minimal invasive methods, such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), are economical and have modest side effects compared with transurethral electro-resection of the prostate (TUR-P). The treatment results from different TUMT-systems vary. Follow-up studies on each system type are therefore necessary. The objectives of this study are to summon the long-term clinical results of our TUMT-system and search for a pre-treatment parameter that can measure responding patients. Material and Methods: Three hundred and seventy-one patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) were treated with TUMT at Karolinska Hospital, Sweden with the ECP-system (Comair AB, Stockholm), for 30 or 60 min. They were followed up 12 to 72 months after TUMT. Results: At follow up approximately 76% subjectively judged that they had benefited from the treatment and 22% judged that they were fully cured. The over-all IPSS and Quality of Life score decreased approximately 40% and 30% respectively. Forty-one per cent of the patients with CAD (cathéter à demeure) before the treatment became permanently or temporarily catheter-free after the treatment. Q max increased 21% and 11% after 1 and 6 months respectively. Q max ranging from over 10 ml/s seem to be a selection parameter that increases the number of responding patients. Conclusion: These long-term clinical data show that TUMT treatment with ECP (electro-coagulation, prostate), gives a good success-rate, with reduction of symptoms. Furthermore there is a good chance of becoming catheter-free after TUMT.

[1]  M. Hilliges,et al.  Denervation of Periurethral Prostatic Tissue by Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy , 2000, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[2]  J. J. de la Rosette,et al.  How to select patients for high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy. , 2011, Urology.

[3]  Brehmer,et al.  Sham treatment compared with 30 or 60 min of thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized study , 1999, BJU international.

[4]  M. Brehmer Morphological changes in prostatic adenomas after transurethral microwave thermotherapy. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[5]  B. Erlandsson,et al.  The heat is on--but how? A comparison of TUMT devices. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[6]  A. Kinn,et al.  Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Subjective response and urodynamic changes. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[7]  C. Ogden,et al.  A 12-month study of the placebo effect in transurethral microwave thermotherapy. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[8]  G. Geirsson,et al.  Transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral resection for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: a prospective randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. , 1995, British journal of urology.

[9]  J. Damber,et al.  Responders and non-responders to treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with transurethral microwave thermotherapy. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[10]  C. Ogden,et al.  Sham versus transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic bladder outflow obstruction , 1993, The Lancet.

[11]  N. Davidson Primary non-Hodgkins lymphoma of the bladder. Case report and review of the literature. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[12]  A T Cockett,et al.  Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[13]  W. M. Schmitt [Microwave therapy]. , 1967, BZB. Bayerisches Zahnarzteblatt.