It doesn’t take a village to fall for misinformation: Social media use, discussion heterogeneity preference, worry of the virus, faith in scientists, and COVID-19-related misinformation beliefs

Abstract With the circulation of misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization has raised concerns about an “infodemic,” which exacerbates people’s misperceptions and deters preventive measures. Against this backdrop, this study examined the conditional indirect effect of social media use and discussion heterogeneity preference on COVID-19-related misinformation beliefs in the United States, using a national survey. Findings suggested that social media use was positively associated with misinformation beliefs, while discussion heterogeneity preference was negatively associated with misinformation beliefs. Furthermore, worry of COVID-19 was found to be a significant mediator as both associations became more significant when mediated through worry. In addition, faith in scientists served as a moderator that mitigated the indirect effect of discussion heterogeneity preference on misinformation beliefs. That is, among those who had stronger faiths in scientists, the indirect effect of discussion heterogeneity preference on misinformation belief became more negative. The findings revealed communication and psychological factors associated with COVID-19-related misinformation beliefs and provided insights into coping strategies during the pandemic.

[1]  Seth Ashley,et al.  News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement , 2017 .

[2]  S. Lupien,et al.  Facebook behaviors associated with diurnal cortisol in adolescents: Is befriending stressful? , 2016, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[3]  P. Sol Hart,et al.  Boomerang Effects in Science Communication , 2012, Commun. Res..

[4]  Costas Panagopoulos,et al.  Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. , 2018, Current opinion in psychology.

[5]  S. Dohle,et al.  Supplementary materials to: Acceptance and adoption of protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of trust in politics and trust in science , 2020 .

[6]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal of chiropractic medicine.

[7]  E. Peters,et al.  Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[8]  T. Borkovec,et al.  Life in the Future Versus Life in the Present , 2006 .

[9]  Emily A. Thorson,et al.  Introduction: Misinformation among Mass Audiences as a Focus for Inquiry , 2018, Misinformation and Mass Audiences.

[10]  Jantsje M. Mol,et al.  Insights into Flood Risk Misperceptions of Homeowners in the Dutch River Delta , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Jiyoung Chae,et al.  Online cancer information seeking increases cancer worry , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  Empowering Users to Respond to Misinformation about Covid-19 , 2020 .

[13]  Sei-Ching Joanna Sin,et al.  Why Students Share Misinformation on Social Media: Motivation, Gender, and Study-level Differences , 2015 .

[14]  Oberiri Destiny Apuke,et al.  Fake news and COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users , 2020, Telematics and Informatics.

[15]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Framing Climate Change: Exploring the Role of Emotion in Generating Advocacy Behavior , 2018, Science Communication.

[16]  James E. Katz,et al.  The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation , 2019, Digital Journalism.

[17]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Trapped in a Double Bind: Chinese Overseas Student Anxiety during the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, Health communication.

[18]  Robert J. Brulle,et al.  The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014 , 2017, Climatic Change.

[19]  Abby L. Braitman,et al.  Worry as a mediator between psychosocial stressors and emotional sequelae: Moderation by contrast avoidance. , 2020, Journal of affective disorders.

[20]  Philip Mai,et al.  Going viral: How a single tweet spawned a COVID-19 conspiracy theory on Twitter , 2020, Big Data Soc..

[21]  Joanne M. Miller,et al.  Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust , 2016 .

[22]  Yonghwan Kim,et al.  College students' social media use and communication network heterogeneity: Implications for social capital and subjective well-being , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Catherine M. Hooker,et al.  Online news creation, trust in the media, and political participation: Direct and moderating effects over time , 2018 .

[24]  Joanne M. Miller.  Do COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs Form a Monological Belief System? , 2020, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[25]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits , 2013 .

[26]  John H. Evans,et al.  Who Doesn’t Trust Fauci? The Public’s Belief in the Expertise and Shared Values of Scientists in the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020 .

[27]  B. Duffy,et al.  Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency , 2020, Psychological Medicine.

[28]  Petter Törnberg,et al.  Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion , 2018, PloS one.

[29]  Diana C. Mutz.  Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[30]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Democracy Based on Difference: Examining the Links Between Structural Heterogeneity, Heterogeneity of Discussion Networks, and Democratic Citizenship , 2006 .

[31]  P. S. Hart,et al.  In consensus we trust? Persuasive effects of scientific consensus communication , 2018, Public understanding of science.

[32]  Christian Fieseler,et al.  The Pursuit of Empowerment through Social Media: Structural Social Capital Dynamics in CSR-Blogging , 2013, Journal of Business Ethics.

[33]  Brigitte Huber,et al.  Social Media and Beliefs about Climate Change: A Cross-National Analysis of News Use, Political Ideology, and Trust in Science , 2019 .

[34]  Fabiana Zollo,et al.  Misinformation spreading on Facebook , 2017, ArXiv.

[35]  Andrea M. Quenette,et al.  Facilitating Social Media and Offline Political Engagement During Electoral Cycles: Using Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Political Action Among Hispanics and Latinos , 2018, Mass Communication and Society.

[36]  Predicting Responses to Climate Change Health Impact Messages From Political Ideology and Health Status: Cognitive Appraisals and Emotional Reactions as Mediators , 2020 .

[37]  Sajib Barua,et al.  Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation , 2020, Progress in Disaster Science.

[38]  Christa Boer,et al.  Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation , 2018, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[39]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors , 2009 .

[40]  Marc S. Wilson,et al.  Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. , 2020, The American psychologist.

[41]  L. Bode,et al.  See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media , 2018, Health communication.

[42]  A. McCright,et al.  The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010 , 2011 .

[43]  Puneet Kaur,et al.  Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior , 2019, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[44]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  R. Garrett.  Troubling Consequences of Online Political Rumoring , 2011 .

[46]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion , 2014 .

[47]  Kaitlin M. Flannery,et al.  Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. , 2017, Journal of affective disorders.

[48]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  The Competition for Worldviews: Values, Information, and Public Support for Stem Cell Research , 2005 .

[49]  Ann E. Williams.  Trust or Bust?: Questioning the Relationship Between Media Trust and News Attention , 2012 .

[50]  J. Niederdeppe,et al.  Pathways of Influence in Emotional Appeals: Benefits and Tradeoffs of Using Fear or Humor to Promote Climate Change-Related Intentions and Risk Perceptions , 2018 .

[51]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[52]  Taylor N. Carlson,et al.  What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation , 2018, Political Behavior.

[53]  Wasim Ahmed,et al.  COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data , 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[54]  K. Kenski,et al.  Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation , 2006 .

[55]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  Sebastián Valenzuela,et al.  Facebook, Twitter, and Youth Engagement: A Quasi-experimental Study of Social Media Use and Protest Behavior Using Propensity Score Matching , 2014 .

[57]  Thomas Koch,et al.  Countering misinformation: Strategies, challenges, and uncertainties , 2019, Studies in Communication and Media.

[58]  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou,et al.  Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media. , 2018, JAMA.