Saphenous Vein Graft Stenting and Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Predictive Model Derived From a Pooled Analysis of 3958 Patients

Background— Treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis with percutaneous coronary intervention has a 15% to 20% incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days. Although MACE rates are reduced significantly by the use of embolic protection devices (EPDs), neither the level of baseline risk nor the benefit provided by EPDs has been well characterized. Methods and Results— Data from 5 randomized controlled trials and 1 registry evaluating EPDs in SVG percutaneous coronary intervention (n=3958 patients) were pooled for analysis. MACE was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Baseline variables and 2 summary angiographic variables (an SVG degeneration score and an estimate of lesion plaque volume) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to predict 30-day MACE, with adjustment for the type of device used and inter-study variation. The angiographic variables were potent predictors of MACE (increasing SVG degeneration score, P<0.0001; larger estimated plaque volume, P<0.0001), with significant contributions from the presence of thrombus (P<0.01), increasing patient age (P<0.01), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (P=0.02), and current tobacco abuse (P=0.03). The treatment benefit of EPDs was preserved across all categories of risk as categorized by SVG degeneration or plaque volume. Conclusions— The strongest predictors of 30-day MACE in SVG percutaneous coronary intervention are angiographic estimates of plaque volume and SVG degeneration. Identification of these predictors of 30-day MACE allows reliable prediction of patient outcomes and confirms consistent treatment benefit with the use of EPDs across the range of patients tested in randomized trials.

[1]  C. Rogers,et al.  The PROXIMAL trial: proximal protection during saphenous vein graft intervention using the Proxis Embolic Protection System: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  C. O'shaughnessy,et al.  Comparison of the CardioShield filter with the guardwire balloon in the prevention of embolisation during vein graft intervention: results from the CAPTIVE randomised trial. , 2006, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  C. Rogers,et al.  Devices for distal protection during percutaneous coronary revascularization. , 2006, Circulation.

[4]  G. Stone,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition as adjunctive treatment during saphenous vein graft stenting: differential effects after randomization to occlusion or filter-based embolic protection. , 2006, European heart journal.

[5]  J. Carrozza,et al.  Randomized evaluation of the TriActiv balloon-protection flush and extraction system for the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  L. Klein,et al.  Determinants of embolic protection device use: Case study in the acceptance of a new medical technology , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Usefulness of embolic protection devices during saphenous vein graft intervention in a nonselected population. , 2005, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[8]  R. Califf,et al.  Coronary drug-eluting stent development: issues in trial design. , 2005, American heart journal.

[9]  D. Baim,et al.  Determinants of 30-day adverse events following saphenous vein graft intervention with and without a distal occlusion embolic protection device. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  S. Murphy,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of distal embolic protection for patients undergoing percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein bypass grafts: results from the SAFER trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  G. Stone,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Distal Protection With a Filter-Based Catheter and a Balloon Occlusion and Aspiration System During Percutaneous Intervention of Diseased Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Bypass Grafts , 2003, Circulation.

[12]  S. Normand,et al.  Application of models for multivariate mixed outcomes to medical device trials: coronary artery stenting , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Lack of Benefit From Intravenous Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibition as Adjunctive Treatment for Percutaneous Interventions of Aortocoronary Bypass Grafts: A Pooled Analysis of Five Randomized Clinical Trials , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  M. Leon,et al.  Randomized Trial of a Distal Embolic Protection Device During Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Bypass Grafts , 2002, Circulation.

[15]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Long-term clinical outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous interventions on saphenous vein grafts. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  G. Stone,et al.  Are we making progress with percutaneous saphenous vein graft treatment? A comparison of 1990 to 1994 and 1995 to 1998 results. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  E. Topol,et al.  Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. , 2000, Circulation.

[18]  G. Stone,et al.  Creatine kinase-MB enzyme elevation following successful saphenous vein graft intervention is associated with late mortality. , 1999, Circulation.

[19]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Retrieval and analysis of particulate debris after saphenous vein graft intervention. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Eric J. Topol,et al.  Textbook of Interventional Cardiology , 1999 .

[21]  E J Topol,et al.  Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. , 1998, Circulation.

[22]  E. Rechavia,et al.  Long-term follow-up of a high risk cohort after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  R. Califf,et al.  Effect of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition on distal embolization during percutaneous revascularization of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts. EPIC Investigators. Evaluation of IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist 7E3 in Preventing Ischemic Complications. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  M. Leon,et al.  Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Short- and long-term outcome of narrowed saphenous vein bypass graft: a comparison of Palmaz-Schatz stent, directional coronary atherectomy, and balloon angioplasty. , 1997, American heart journal.

[26]  D. Baim,et al.  Editorial comment: Understanding the “no‐reflow” problem , 1996 .

[27]  W J Keon,et al.  Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  D. Baim,et al.  Understanding the "no-reflow" problem. , 1996, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[29]  O. Nwasokwa Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Disease , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  R. Califf,et al.  Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT-II trial. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. , 1995, Circulation.

[31]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Features and outcome of no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  J. Reiber,et al.  A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  D. Baim,et al.  Incidence and treatment of 'no-reflow' after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 1994, Circulation.

[34]  J. Douglas,et al.  Angiographic predictors of a rise in serum creatine kinase (distal embolization) after balloon angioplasty of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  E. Topol,et al.  Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of lesions in saphenous vein bypass grafts. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  C M Gibson,et al.  Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  L. Campeau,et al.  Long-term angiographic follow-up after angioplasty of venous coronary bypass grafts. , 1991, American Heart Journal.

[38]  P. Whitlow,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of saphenous vein graft stenosis: long-term follow-up. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  R. Shaw,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of stenotic coronary artery bypass grafts: 5 years' experience. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.