What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes

This article presents a four-category framework to characterize the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. The framework distinguishes between prescriptions and proscriptions that are intensified by virtue of one's gender, and those that are relaxed by virtue of one's gender. Two studies examined the utility of this framework for characterizing prescriptive gender stereotypes in American society (Study 1) and in the highly masculine context of Princeton University (Study 2). The results demonstrated the persistence of traditional gender prescriptions in both contexts, but also revealed distinct areas of societal vigilance and leeway for each gender. In addition, they showed that women are seen more positively, relative to societal standards, than are men. We consider the implications of this framework for research on reactions to gender stereotype deviants and sex discrimination.

[1]  A. Eagly,et al.  Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[2]  C. Auster,et al.  Masculinity and Femininity in Contemporary American Society: A Reevaluation Using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory , 2000 .

[3]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research , 2000 .

[4]  G. E. Berrios,et al.  . New York: Cambridge , 2000 .

[5]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  E. Borgida,et al.  Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex Discrimination , 1999 .

[7]  S. Fiske,et al.  Sexism and other "isms": Independence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. , 1999 .

[8]  C. Holt,et al.  Assessing the Current Validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory , 1998 .

[9]  J. Eccles,et al.  The Accuracy and Power of Sex, Social Class, and Ethnic Stereotypes: A Naturalistic Study in Person Perception , 1998 .

[10]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[12]  Karen E. Dill,et al.  Evaluations of Ingroup and Outgroup Members: The Role of Category-Based Expectancy Violation , 1997 .

[13]  I. Frieze,et al.  The Measurement of Gender-Role Attitudes , 1997 .

[14]  M. Biernat,et al.  Gender- and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups , 1997 .

[15]  M. Biernat,et al.  Gender- and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women , 1996 .

[17]  G. Clore,et al.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1996 .

[18]  Allen C. Harris Ethnicity as a determinant of sex role identity: A replication study of item selection for the Bem Sex Role Inventory , 1994 .

[19]  M. Banaji,et al.  The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness , 1994 .

[20]  B. Tepper,et al.  Strength of Subordinates’ Upward Influence Tactics and Gender Congruency Effects1 , 1993 .

[21]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Stereotypes and the Construal of Individuating Information , 1993 .

[22]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture. , 1992 .

[23]  M. Heilman,et al.  Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.. , 1991 .

[24]  C. Hoffman,et al.  Gender stereotypes : perception or rationalization? , 1990 .

[25]  Florence Geis,et al.  Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. , 1990 .

[26]  L. Jussim,et al.  The nature of stereotypes: a comparison and integration of three theories , 1987 .

[27]  A. Eagly Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[28]  G. Russell,et al.  An Australian sex‐role scale , 1981 .

[29]  S. Bem,et al.  Bem sex-role inventory : professional manual , 1981 .

[30]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  J. Stoppard,et al.  Can gender stereotypes and sex-role conceptions be distinguished? , 1978 .

[32]  G. Stricker Implications of research for psychotherapeutic treatment of women. , 1980, The American psychologist.

[33]  J. Kelly,et al.  Socially undesirable sex-correlated characteristics: implications for androgyny and adjustment. , 1977, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[34]  D. Corey,et al.  Sex-diagnosticity in 100 Personality Trait Adjectives , 1977 .

[35]  Jeanne Marecek,et al.  When Stereotypes Hurt: Three Studies of Penalties for Sex-Role Reversals. , 1975 .

[36]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  S. Bem The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[38]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal , 1972 .

[39]  W. V. Bingham,et al.  Expectancies , 1953 .