Characteristics of habituation of the sympathetic skin response to repeated electrical stimuli in man

OBJECTIVES To study the effect of repeating electrical peripheral nerve stimulation on latency, duration and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response (SSR). METHODS SSRs were elicited in all limbs by median and peroneal nerves stimuli. In 10 subjects, 20 stimuli were applied at random time intervals (15-20 s). Another test was performed in 7 subjects using the same protocol, but switching the stimulation site every 5 or 10 stimuli without warning. RESULTS The mean amplitude of right palmar response to right peroneal nerve stimulation decreased from 5.05+/-0.76 (SEM) mV at the first stimulus to 1.23+/-0.42 mV at the 20th stimulus (P<0.001). The latency did not change significantly (1473+/-82 to 1550+/-90 ms, P>0.1), while the duration increased (1872+/-356 to 3170+/-681 ms, P<0.001). Stimulation and recording at other sites showed similar trends. Changing the stimulation site failed to alter the adaptation process in terms of amplitude, latency or duration. CONCLUSIONS Changes in amplitude and duration of the SSRs to repeated electrical stimuli can occur in presence of constant latency and appear to be independent of the source of sensory input. Peripheral sweat gland mechanisms may be involved in the loss of amplitude and increase in duration of the SSR during habituation.

[1]  R. Hoeldtke,et al.  Autonomic surface potential analysis: Assessment of reproducibility and sensitivity , 1992, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Elie,et al.  Sympathetic skin response: normal results in different experimental conditions. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  J Jamart,et al.  The influence of skin temperature on latency and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response in normal subjects , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  Wally Knezevic,et al.  Peripheral autonomic surface potential A quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man , 1985, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[6]  J. Halperin,et al.  Sympathetic skin response--a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. , 1984, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  V. Dietz,et al.  Significance of sympathetic skin response in the assessment of autonomic failure in patients with spinal cord injury. , 1996, Journal of the autonomic nervous system.

[8]  K. Deguchi,et al.  Significance of cognitive function in the elicitation of sympathetic skin response in healthy humans. , 1996, Journal of the autonomic nervous system.

[9]  B. Wallin,et al.  Non-linearity of skin resistance response to intraneural electrical stimulation of sudomotor nerves. , 1992, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[10]  R. E. Lovelace,et al.  The sympathetic skin response: Normal values, elucidation of afferent components and application limits , 1988, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[11]  M. Toyokura Waveform variation and size of sympathetic skin response: regional difference between the sole and palm recordings , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Y Hirasawa,et al.  A study of the normal values and habituation phenomenon of sympathetic skin response. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[13]  K Hirose,et al.  Sympathetic skin response in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with patients with spinal cord transection and normal controls. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  K. Hagbarth,et al.  Thermoregulatory and rhythm‐generating mechanisms governing the sudomotor and vasoconstrictor outflow in human cutaneous nerves. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.