Are Racial Stereotypes Really Fading? The Princeton Trilogy Revisited

In this article, the authors identify three methodological short-comings of the classic Princeton trilogy studies: (a) ambiguity of the instructions given to respondents, (b) no assessment of respondents' level of prejudice, and (c) use of an outdated list of adjectives. These shortcomings are addressed in the authors' assessment of the stereotype and personal beliefs of a sample of University of Wisconsin students. In contrast to the commonly espoused fading stereotype proposition, data suggest that there exists a consistent and negative contemporary stereotype of Blacks. Comparing the data from the Princeton trilogy studies with those of the present study, the authors conclude that the Princeton trilogy studies actually measured respondents' personal beliefs, not (as typically assumed) their knowledge of the Black stereotype. Consistent with Devine's model, high- and low-prejudiced individuals did not differ in their knowledge of the stereotype of Blacks but diverged sharply in their endorsement of the stereotype.

[1]  D. Katz,et al.  Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. , 1933 .

[2]  M. Karlins,et al.  On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Current Stereotypes: A Little Fading, a Little Faking. , 1971 .

[4]  C. McCauley,et al.  An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. , 1978 .

[5]  F. Crosby,et al.  Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. , 1980 .

[6]  S. Sherman,et al.  Attitude bolstering when behavior is inconsistent with central attitudes , 1980 .

[7]  J. B. Mcconahay,et al.  Has Racism Declined in America? , 1981 .

[8]  S. Gaertner,et al.  Racial stereotypes: associations and ascription of positive and negative characteristic , 1983 .

[9]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[10]  M. Rothbart,et al.  On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. , 1986 .

[11]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations☆ , 1986 .

[12]  Ethnic Stereotypes: Implications of Measurement Strategy , 1988 .

[13]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[14]  A. Elliot,et al.  Prejudice with and without compunction , 1991 .

[15]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  The Role of Discrepancy-Associated Affect in Prejudice Reduction , 1993 .

[16]  P. Devine,et al.  Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies. , 1993 .

[17]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. , 1993 .

[18]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound , 1994 .