Relating environmental attitudes and contingent values: how robust are methods for identifying preference heterogeneity?

We assess the importance and robustness of cluster analysis and latent class analysis as methods to account for unobserved heterogeneity. We provide a critique and comparison of both methods in the context of measuring environmental attitudes and a contingent valuation study involving endangered species. We find strong evidence of robustness for these methods: group characterization and assignment of individuals to groups are similar between methods, and willingness-to-pay estimates are consistent. In addition, there are significant differences in willingness-to-pay across environmental attitudinal groups, and we find that accounting for unobservable heterogeneity provides a significantly better fitting model.

[1]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  Latent Gold : User's Manual , 2000 .

[2]  E. Diener,et al.  Comparing Typological Structures Across Cultures By Multigroup Latent Class Analysis , 2003 .

[3]  M. Aldenderfer.  Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[4]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preferences , 2005, Land Economics.

[5]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement , 2004 .

[6]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects1 , 1995 .

[7]  D. Wishart.  Clustan : user manual , 1978 .

[8]  L. J. Bain,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Mathematical Statistics , 1987 .

[9]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: The Use of Latent Class Analysis , 1999 .

[10]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models , 1999 .

[11]  A. F. Smith,et al.  Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions , 1986 .

[12]  J. Pennings,et al.  The Role of Farmers' Behavioral Attitudes and Heterogeneity in Futures Contracts Usage , 2000 .

[13]  Peter Arcidiacono,et al.  Finite Mixture Distributions, Sequential Likelihood and the EM Algorithm , 2003 .

[14]  Jennifer A. Thacher,et al.  Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model , 2006 .

[15]  H. Charles Romesburg,et al.  Cluster analysis for researchers , 1984 .

[16]  D. Nowell,et al.  The new environmental paradigm scale: Wildlife and environmental beliefs in British Columbia , 1989 .

[17]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[18]  N. Guppy,et al.  Canadian Public Opinion and Environmental Action: Evidence from British Columbia , 1997, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[19]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  'EM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data 1 , 1997 .

[20]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE-RESPONSE CV DATA , 1996 .

[21]  Paulo A. L. D. Nunes,et al.  Using factor analysis to identify consumer preferences for the protection of a natural area in Portugal , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[23]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[24]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[25]  Örjan Wiidegren,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms , 1998 .

[26]  J. Pierce,et al.  Environmental belief systems among Japanese and American elites and publics , 1987 .

[27]  J. Thacher,et al.  Using patient characteristics and attitudinal data to identify depression treatment preference groups: a latent‐class model , 2005, Depression and anxiety.

[28]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[29]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions , 2005 .

[30]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[31]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[32]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[33]  Erik Schokkaert,et al.  Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation , 2003 .

[34]  D. Bartholomew.  Latent Variable Models And Factor Analysis , 1987 .

[35]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[36]  Katheline Schubert,et al.  Growth, Environment and Uncertain Future Preferences , 2004 .

[37]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Protection Motivation Theory and Contingent Valuation: Perceived Realism, Threat and WTP Estimates for Biodiversity Protection , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[38]  H. Bozdogan.  Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[39]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Random effects analysis , 2003 .

[40]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[41]  Joanne Vining,et al.  Reducing Solid Waste , 1999 .

[42]  Michael Creel,et al.  Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. , 1991 .

[43]  P. Boxall,et al.  Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach , 2002 .

[44]  P. Franses,et al.  Asymptotically perfect and relative convergence of productivity , 2000 .

[45]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Environmental Values in American Culture , 1995 .

[46]  P. Sopp.  Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[47]  Thomas A. Burnham,et al.  CONSUMER RESPONSE TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: MARKET SEGMENT ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCERS AND POLICY MAKERS , 2001 .

[48]  B. Everitt,et al.  Cluster Analysis: Low Temperatures and Voting in Congress , 2001 .

[49]  Anton K. Formann,et al.  Latent class model diagnostics - a review and some proposals , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[50]  S. Dibb.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[51]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Implementing the Convolutions Approach: A Companion to "Measuring the Difference (X-Y) of Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions Approach" , 1994 .

[52]  Q. Vuong.  Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[53]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries , 2001 .