Little Evidence for Synergism Among Deleterious Mutations in a Nonsegmented RNA Virus

Abstract. Several models have been proposed to account for the segmentation of RNA viruses. One of the best known models suggests that segmentation, and mixing of segments during coinfections, is a way to eliminate deleterious mutations from the genome. However, for validity, this model requires that deleterious mutations interact in a synergistic way. That is, two mutations together should have a more deleterious effect than the result of adding their individual effects. Here I present evidence that deleterious mutations in foot-and-mouth disease virus produce a decline in fitness but that the relationship between the number of mutations fixed and the magnitude of fitness decline is compatible mainly with a nonsynergistic model. However, the statistical uncertainties associated with the data still give some room for the existence of very weak synergistic epistasis.

[1]  S. Elena,et al.  Evolution of fitness in experimental populations of vesicular stomatitis virus. , 1996, Genetics.

[2]  M W Feldman,et al.  Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[3]  P. Magnus Incomplete Forms of Influenza Virus , 1954 .

[4]  M. Kimura,et al.  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. , 1966, Genetics.

[5]  R. Lenski,et al.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria , 1997, Nature.

[6]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[7]  A. Kondrashov Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[8]  M. Nei Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[9]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Unravelling the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex : a Commentary on ' Mutation–selection Balance and the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex and Recombination ' , 2022 .

[10]  A. Moya,et al.  Genetic lesions associated with Muller's ratchet in an RNA virus. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Lin Chao,et al.  Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet , 1990, Nature.

[12]  J. Holland,et al.  Quantitation of relative fitness and great adaptability of clonal populations of RNA viruses , 1991, Journal of virology.

[13]  George C. Williams,et al.  Sex and evolution. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[14]  S. Elena,et al.  Genetic bottlenecks and population passages cause profound fitness differences in RNA viruses , 1993, Journal of virology.

[15]  L. Chao Evolution of sex in RNA viruses. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  A. Moya,et al.  Rapid fitness losses in mammalian RNA virus clones due to Muller's ratchet. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Elena,et al.  Many-trillionfold amplification of single RNA virus particles fails to overcome the Muller's ratchet effect , 1993, Journal of virology.

[18]  L. Chao,et al.  Levels of selection, evolution of sex in RNA viruses, and the origin of life. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  L. Chao Evolution of sex and the molecular clock in RNA viruses. , 1997, Gene.

[20]  Tim Gerrodette,et al.  Models for Power of Detecting Trends: A Reply to Link and Hatfield , 1991 .

[21]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[22]  R. Redfield Evolution of bacterial transformation: is sex with dead cells ever better than no sex at all? , 1988, Genetics.

[23]  M. Kimura,et al.  Evolution in Sexual and Asexual Populations , 1965, The American Naturalist.