A two-dimensional car-following model for two-dimensional traffic flow problems

Abstract This paper proposes a two-dimensional car-following model to tackle traffic flow problems where considering continuum lateral distances enables a simpler or more natural mathematical formulation compared to traditional car-following models. These problems include (i) the effects of lateral friction often observed in HOV lanes and diverge bottlenecks, (ii) the relaxation phenomenon at merge bottlenecks, (iii) the occurrence of accidents due to lane changing, and (iv) traffic models for autonomous vehicles (AVs). We conjecture that traditional car-following models, where the lateral dimension is discretized into lanes, struggle with these problems and one has to resort to ad-hoc rules conceived to directly achieve the desired effect, and that are difficult to validate. We argue that the distance maintained by drivers in order to avoid collisions in all directions plays a fundamental role in all these problems. To test this hypothesis, we propose a simple two-dimensional microscopic car-following model based on the social force paradigm, and build simulation experiments that reproduce these phenomena. These phenomena are reproduced as an indirect consequence of the model’s formulation, as opposed to ad-hoc rules, thus shedding light on their causes. A better understanding of the behavior of human drivers in the lateral dimension can be translated to improving autonomous driving algorithms so that they are human-friendly. In addition, since AV technology is proprietary, we argue that the proposed model should provide a good starting point for building AV traffic flow models when real data becomes available, as these data come from sensors that cover two-dimensional regions.

[1]  Alessandro Calvi Does Roadside Vegetation Affect Driving Performance?: Driving Simulator Study on the Effects of Trees on Drivers' Speed and Lateral Position , 2015 .

[2]  Dianhai Wang,et al.  Non-Lane-Based Car-Following Model with Visual Angle Information , 2011 .

[3]  Amir Ghiasi,et al.  A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method , 2017 .

[4]  M. Cassidy,et al.  Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks , 1999 .

[5]  Benjamin Coifman,et al.  Freeway On-ramp Bottleneck Activation, Capacity and the Fundamental Relationship , 2013 .

[6]  Benjamin Coifman,et al.  Extended bottlenecks, the fundamental relationship, and capacity drop on freeways , 2011 .

[7]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance , 2008 .

[8]  Alireza Talebpour,et al.  Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput , 2016 .

[9]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Analysis of Operational Interactions between Freeway Managed Lanes and Parallel, General Purpose Lanes , 2011 .

[10]  Steven A. Shafer,et al.  A computational model of driving for autonomous vehicles , 1993 .

[11]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Towards vehicle automation: Roadway capacity formulation for traffic mixed with regular and automated vehicles , 2017 .

[12]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[13]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE STRUCTURE OF LANE-CHANGING DECISIONS , 1986 .

[14]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Lane-changing in traffic streams , 2006 .

[15]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Increasing Capacity of an Isolated Merge by Metering its On-Ramp , 2004 .

[16]  Christos Katrakazas,et al.  Real-time motion planning methods for autonomous on-road driving: State-of-the-art and future research directions , 2015 .

[17]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Modeling the Lane-Changing Execution of Multiclass Vehicles under Heavy Traffic Conditions , 2010 .

[18]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Macroscopic traffic flow modeling with adaptive cruise control: Development and numerical solution , 2015, Comput. Math. Appl..

[19]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits , 2018 .

[20]  Alireza Talebpour,et al.  Effect of information availability on stability of traffic flow: Percolation theory approach , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[21]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Merging Behavior at Freeway On-Ramp , 2010 .

[22]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[23]  Banihan Gunay,et al.  Car following theory with lateral discomfort , 2007 .

[24]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  GENERALIZED FORCE MODEL OF TRAFFIC DYNAMICS , 1998 .

[25]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Capacity drops at merges: An endogenous model , 2011 .

[26]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[27]  Jorge A. Laval,et al.  Microscopic modeling of the relaxation phenomenon using a macroscopic lane-changing model , 2008 .

[28]  Jorge A. Laval,et al.  The kinematic wave model with finite decelerations: A social force car-following model approximation , 2015 .

[29]  Martin Fellendorf,et al.  Modeling Concepts for Mixed Traffic , 2012 .

[30]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[31]  Sheng Jin,et al.  Non-lane-based full velocity difference car following model , 2010 .

[32]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Capacity drops at merges: New analytical investigations , 2016 .

[33]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[34]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks , 2007 .

[35]  John W. Polak,et al.  Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity , 2015 .

[36]  A Taragin DRIVER BEHAVIOR AS AFFECTED BY OBJECTS ON HIGHWAY SHOULDERS , 1955 .

[37]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Self-driven particle model for mixed traffic and other disordered flows , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[38]  Xiaoxiang Ma,et al.  Assess the impacts of different autonomous trucks’ lateral control modes on asphalt pavement performance , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[39]  Madhav Chitturi,et al.  Effect of Lane Width on Speeds of Cars and Heavy Vehicles in Work Zones , 2005 .

[40]  Tingru Zhang,et al.  Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants , 2020 .

[41]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  50th Anniversary Invited Article - Autonomous Vehicles and Connected Vehicle Systems: Flow and Operations Considerations , 2016, Transp. Sci..

[42]  Nakayama,et al.  Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[43]  Bin Ran,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of the Lane-Changing Execution in Longitudinal Direction , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.