Impact of channel power and fairness concern on supplier’s market entry decision

In a two-stage supply chain comprising a supplier and a retailer, we incorporate the concepts of channel power and fairness concern to analyze the supplier’s decision on whether to open an online direct channel or not. With an online channel, the supplier competes with its retailer in a dual-channel system, but the retailer may shift part or all orders to another supplier as the counteraction. Otherwise, the supplier only obtains the wholesaling profit but loses that from the online market. Taking the retail prices and the quality of the online product as decision variables, we show that the introduction of a direct channel leads to the decline of online product’s quality and retail price. Interestingly, we find that the retailer’s profit may be decreasing in its channel power. Comparing the outcomes with those from pure competing channels, we find that the retailer’s order shifting strategy may result in a lose–lose situation for the two firms, but it can be a credible threat to the supplier’s market entry. We also find that the supplier’s fairness concern may effectively reduce its incentives to open an online channel.

[1]  Jianbin Li,et al.  Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Competing with bandit supply chains , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Chengbin Chu,et al.  Newsvendor model for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns , 2014 .

[4]  Elena Katok,et al.  Wholesale Pricing under Mild and Privately Known Concerns for Fairness , 2014 .

[5]  A. Shaked,et al.  Relaxing price competition through product differentiation , 1982 .

[6]  A. Tsay,et al.  Channel Conflict and Coordination in the E‐Commerce Age , 2004 .

[7]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Quantity commitment, production and subcontracting with bargaining , 2009 .

[8]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Quality and Competition , 1998 .

[9]  R. Bies,et al.  Beyond distrust: "Getting even" and the need for revenge. , 1996 .

[10]  Dae-Hee Yoon,et al.  Friction in Related-Party Trade When a Rival Is Also a Customer , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Jian Huang,et al.  Demand Functions in Decision Modeling: A Comprehensive Survey and Research Directions , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[12]  Yulan Wang,et al.  Equilibrium pricing sequence in a co-opetitive supply chain with the ODM as a downstream rival of its OEM , 2015 .

[13]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[14]  Xin Fang,et al.  Combating Strategic Counterfeiters in Licit and Illicit Supply Chains , 2015, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[15]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Electronic books: To "E" or not to "E"? A strategic analysis of distribution channel choices of publishers , 2011 .

[16]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual - Channel Supply - Chain Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Chengbin Chu,et al.  Reciprocal supply chain with intention , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Price and lead time decisions in dual-channel supply chains , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  A. Tsay,et al.  Modeling Conflict and Coordination in Multi-Channel Distribution Systems: A Review , 2004 .

[20]  Tony Haitao Cui,et al.  Fairness and Channel Coordination , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Hongyan Shi,et al.  Consumer Heterogeneity, Product Quality, and Distribution Channels , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Yulan Wang,et al.  On the Advantage of Quantity Leadership When Outsourcing Production to a Competitive Contract Manufacturer , 2013 .

[23]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .