Genotypic m3‐Muscarinic Receptors Preferentially Inhibit M‐currents in DNA‐transfected NG108‐15 Neuroblastoma × Glioma Hybrid Cells

The ability of different genotypic muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) to inhibit the neural K+‐current, IM, was assessed in clones of NG108‐15 mouse neuroblastoma × rat glioma cells transfected with DNA for the genomic mAChRs ml –4 using tight‐seal, whole‐cell patch clamp recording. No significant inhibition of IM was seen in native (non‐transfected) cells, or in m2 or m4 DNA‐transfected cells at concentrations of acetylcholine up to 1 mM or muscarine up to 100 μM. Both acetylcholine and muscarine produced complete inhibition of IM in m3 DNA‐transfected cells, but only partial (50–60%) inhibition in m1 DNA‐transfected cells at maximally effective concentrations. This difference could not be explained by differences in mAChR number, as measured by radioligand binding and was not eliminated by adding GTP to the pipette. It is concluded that genotypic m3 receptors couple most effectively to IM and that this may explain previously reported instances of pirenzepine‐resistant IM‐inhibition.

[1]  M. Caulfield Muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition of voltage-activated Ca current in neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid (NG 108-15) cells — reduction of muscarinic agonist and antagonist potency by tetraethylammonium (TEA) , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  S. Lazareno,et al.  Characterization of muscarinic M4 binding sites in rabbit lung, chicken heart, and NG108-15 cells. , 1990, Molecular pharmacology.

[3]  B. Alger,et al.  Activation of the pharmacologically defined M3 muscarinic receptor depolarizes hippocampal pyramidal cells , 1990, Brain Research.

[4]  K. Fukuda,et al.  Selective coupling of different muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to neuronal calcium currents in DNA-transfected cells , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  T. Bonner The molecular basis of muscarinic receptor diversity , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  N. Marrion,et al.  Muscarinic suppression of the M‐current in the rat sympathetic ganglion is mediated by receptors of the M1‐subtype , 1989, British journal of pharmacology.

[7]  P. Adams,et al.  A G Protein Mediates the Inhibition of the Voltage‐Dependent Potassium M Current by Muscarine, LHRH, Substance P and UTP in Bullfrog Sympathetic Neurons , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  D. A. Brown,et al.  On the transduction mechanism for muscarine‐induced inhibition of M‐current in cultured rat sympathetic neurones. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  T. Bonner,et al.  Antagonist binding properties of five cloned muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells. , 1989, Molecular pharmacology.

[10]  D. Brown M-currents: an update , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  M. Brann,et al.  Localization of a family of muscarinic receptor mRNAs in rat brain , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Nakai,et al.  Different sensitivities to agonist of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes , 1988, FEBS letters.

[13]  E. Neher,et al.  Intracellular calcium release mediated by two muscarinic receptor subtypes , 1988, FEBS letters.

[14]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Classification of muscarinic responses in hippocampus in terms of receptor subtypes and second-messenger systems: electrophysiological studies in vitro , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Mishina,et al.  Selective coupling with K+ currents of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in NG108-15 cells , 1988, Nature.

[16]  P. Pfaffinger Muscarine and t-LHRH suppress M-current by activating an IAP- insensitive G-protein , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  W. Almers,et al.  Agonists that suppress M-current elicit phosphoinositide turnover and Ca2+ transients, but these events do not explain M-current suppression , 1988, Neuron.

[18]  J. Nakai,et al.  Primary structure of porcine muscarinic acetylcholine receptor III and antagonist binding studies , 1988, FEBS letters.

[19]  D. A. Brown,et al.  Membrane current responses of NG108‐15 mouse neuroblastoma x rat glioma hybrid cells to bradykinin. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  D. A. Brown,et al.  Voltage‐ and calcium‐activated potassium currents in mouse neuroblastoma x rat glioma hybrid cells. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  A. Ashkenazi,et al.  Distinct primary structures, ligand‐binding properties and tissue‐specific expression of four human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[22]  A. Constanti,et al.  Muscarinic receptors mediating suppression of the M‐current in guinea‐pig olfactory cortex neurones may be of the M2‐subtype , 1987, British journal of pharmacology.

[23]  D. A. Brown,et al.  Pharmacological inhibition of the M‐current , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  D. A. Brown,et al.  M‐currents and other potassium currents in bullfrog sympathetic neurones , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  N. Birdsall,et al.  Muscarinic receptor subtypes. , 1990, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.