Usefulness and limitations of dK random graph models to predict interactions and functional homogeneity in biological networks under a pseudo-likelihood parameter estimation approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Roded Sharan,et al. Revealing modularity and organization in the yeast molecular network by integrated analysis of highly heterogeneous genomewide data. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[2] Priya Mahadevan,et al. Systematic topology analysis and generation using degree correlations , 2006, SIGCOMM.
[3] Albert-László Barabási,et al. Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.
[4] Dennis B. Troup,et al. NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles—database and tools update , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[5] Alan M. Frieze,et al. Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.
[6] M. Ashburner,et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.
[7] Duncan J. Watts,et al. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.
[8] Albert,et al. Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.
[9] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. MIPS: analysis and annotation of genome information in 2007 , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[10] F. Chung,et al. Connected Components in Random Graphs with Given Expected Degree Sequences , 2002 .
[11] Roded Sharan,et al. Discovering statistically significant biclusters in gene expression data , 2002, ISMB.
[12] Mike Tyers,et al. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[13] C. D. Gelatt,et al. Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.
[14] S. Shen-Orr,et al. Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004, Science.