Prasugrel.

Summary and Recommendations Prasugrel is a third-generation thienopyridine with moreconsistent and efficient metabolism than clopidogrel, thecurrent standard of care. Pharmacodynamic studies haveshown that patients taking prasugrel compared with standardor higher doses of clopidogrel have higher levels of thien-opyridine active metabolite and higher and more consistentlevels of platelet inhibition. Prasugrel appears less susceptibleto genetic variation and drug-drug interactions, which canlimit the antiplatelet activity and clinical effectiveness ofclopidogrel. This pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamicsuperiority is translated into improved ischemic outcomes butmore bleeding in patients with ACS and planned PCI. Thesedata serve as the first to definitively demonstrate that an agent(or dose of an agent) with higher and more consistent levelsof platelet P2Y 12 inhibition can reduce ischemic events, a keyresearch question in cardiology, and set the stage for furtherresearch on personalized medicine, alternative agents, andalternative platelet targets. These data, however, do notindicate the presence of specific goal levels of plateletinhibition for individual patients. Ticagrelor, a direct, non-thienopyridine P2Y

[1]  M. Keltai,et al.  Intensive oral antiplatelet therapy for reduction of ischaemic events including stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a subanalysis of a randomised trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[2]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism and stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2008, European heart journal.

[3]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38). , 2006, American heart journal.

[4]  K. Winters,et al.  Cytochrome P450 3A Inhibition by Ketoconazole Affects Prasugrel and Clopidogrel Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Differently , 2007, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[5]  K. Winters,et al.  Effect of Age on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Prasugrel during Multiple Dosing , 2009, Drugs & aging.

[6]  E. Antman,et al.  A perspective on the efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  O. Hess,et al.  CLINICAL RESEARCH Interventional Cardiology Stent Thrombosis Is Associated With an Impaired Response to Antiplatelet Therapy , 2005 .

[8]  A. Gori,et al.  Impact of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration on drug-eluting stent thrombosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R. Storey The P2Y 12 receptor as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease , 2001, Platelets.

[10]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .

[12]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[13]  E. Antman,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses to Evaluate the Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on Exposure of Prasugrel Active Metabolite in TRITON‐TIMI 38 , 2009, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[14]  K. Winters,et al.  Prasugrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in subjects with moderate renal impairment and end‐stage renal disease , 2009, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[15]  G. Stone,et al.  Role of clopidogrel loading dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: results from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  S. Pocock,et al.  A Clinical Trial Comparing Three Antithrombotic-Drug Regimens after Coronary-Artery Stenting , 1998 .

[17]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel STEMI subgroup analysis – Authors' reply , 2009, The Lancet.

[18]  E. Flatau,et al.  Bone marrow aplasia associated with ticlopidine therapy , 1993, American journal of hematology.

[19]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  F. Neumann,et al.  Impact of the degree of peri-interventional platelet inhibition after loading with clopidogrel on early clinical outcome of elective coronary stent placement. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  V. Pasceri,et al.  Randomized Trial of High Loading Dose of Clopidogrel for Reduction of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention: Results From the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study* , 2005, Circulation.

[22]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2006, European heart journal.

[23]  K. Winters,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel in subjects with moderate liver disease , 2009, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[24]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel Compared With High Loading– and Maintenance–Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 Trial , 2007, Circulation.

[25]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  E. Fleck,et al.  Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study. , 1998, Circulation.

[27]  S. Pocock,et al.  A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  R. Collins,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[29]  K. Winters,et al.  A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation. , 2007, American heart journal.

[30]  M. Bertrand,et al.  Double-blind study of the safety of clopidogrel with and without a loading dose in combination with aspirin compared with ticlopidine in combination with aspirin after coronary stenting : the clopidogrel aspirin stent international cooperative study (CLASSICS). , 2000, Circulation.

[31]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[32]  A. Skene,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  E. Antman,et al.  Pharmacodynamic effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel and prasugrel with or without a proton-pump inhibitor: an analysis of two randomised trials , 2009, The Lancet.

[34]  L. Jennings Mechanisms of platelet activation: Need for new strategies to protect against platelet-mediated atherothrombosis , 2009, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[35]  Jessica L Mega,et al.  Cytochrome P450 Genetic Polymorphisms and the Response to Prasugrel: Relationship to Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Clinical Outcomes , 2009, Circulation.

[36]  E. Antman,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315), a Novel Thienopyridine P2Y12 Antagonist, With Clopidogrel in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of the Joint Utilization of Medications to Block Platelets Optimally (JUMBO)–TIMI 26 Trial , 2005, Circulation.

[37]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention—summary article: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines(ACC/AHA/SCAI writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention) , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  J. Herbert,et al.  P2Y12, A New Platelet ADP Receptor, Target of Clopidogrel , 2003, Seminars in vascular medicine.

[39]  T. Gillespie,et al.  The Disposition of Prasugrel, a Novel Thienopyridine, in Humans , 2007, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[40]  M. O’Donoghue,et al.  Clopidogrel Response Variability and Future Therapies: Clopidogrel: Does One Size Fit All? , 2006, Circulation.

[41]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[42]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  E. Antman,et al.  Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  E. Unger,et al.  Weighing benefits and risks--the FDA's review of prasugrel. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  E. Antman,et al.  The efficacy and safety of prasugrel with and without a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism in young patients treated with clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a cohort study , 2009, The Lancet.

[47]  P. Gurbel,et al.  Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: results of the CREST Study. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  J. O’Connell,et al.  Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. , 2009, JAMA.

[49]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Prasugrel: a novel thienopyridine antiplatelet agent. A review of preclinical and clinical studies and the mechanistic basis for its distinct antiplatelet profile. , 2007, Cardiovascular drug reviews.

[51]  G. Lamas,et al.  Focused Update of the ACC / AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2007 .

[52]  K. Hagihara,et al.  The greater in vivo antiplatelet effects of prasugrel as compared to clopidogrel reflect more efficient generation of its active metabolite with similar antiplatelet activity to that of clopidogrel’s active metabolite , 2007, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[53]  E. Antman,et al.  Greater Clinical Benefit of More Intensive Oral Antiplatelet Therapy With Prasugrel in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 , 2008, Circulation.

[54]  Joseph P Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[55]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Meta-analysis appraising high clopidogrel loading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.