Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head
暂无分享,去创建一个
Harold I Feldman | Christopher H Schmid | Jesse A Berlin | C. Schmid | J. Berlin | H. Feldman | L. Szczech | J. Santanna | Lynda A Szczech | Jill Santanna | Jill Santanna
[1] S G Thompson,et al. Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.
[2] D. Slakey,et al. DELAYED CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT REJECTION DUE TO COMBINED CYCLOSPORINE AND ANTIOXIDANT THERAPY , 1993, Transplantation.
[3] J. Fleiss. Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis , 1993 .
[4] A. Novick,et al. LOW‐DOSE MAINTENANCE PREDNISONE AND ANTILYMPHOBLAST GLOBULIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE REJECTION , 1983, Transplantation.
[5] Shu-chen Wu,et al. A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF INDUCTION THERAPY WITH OKT3 IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION , 1993, Transplantation.
[6] S. Sharp,et al. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. , 1999 .
[7] M Susser,et al. The logic in ecological: I. The logic of analysis. , 1994, American journal of public health.
[8] I Olkin,et al. Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.
[9] S. Schwartz. The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: the potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. , 1994, American journal of public health.
[10] G. Smith,et al. Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies , 1998, BMJ.
[11] J. Wittes,et al. Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. , 1991, JAMA.
[12] A. Gaber,et al. Complications and monitoring of OKT3 therapy. , 1988, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.
[13] J. Berlin,et al. The Effect of Antilymphocyte Induction Therapy on Renal Allograft Survival , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[14] H. Morgenstern. Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. , 1982, American journal of public health.
[15] M. Parmar,et al. Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? , 1993, The Lancet.
[16] Christopher H. Schmid,et al. Exploring Heterogeneity in Randomized Trials Via Meta-Analysis , 1999 .
[17] R. J. Hayes,et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.
[18] R. Fisher,et al. Increased incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder after immunosuppression with the monoclonal antibody OKT3 in cardiac-transplant recipients. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.
[19] L F Burmeister,et al. A comparison of meta-analytic results using literature vs individual patient data. Paternal cell immunization for recurrent miscarriage. , 1995, JAMA.
[20] P. Vereerstraeten,et al. THE LONG‐TERM EFFECTS OF PROPHYLACTIC OKT3 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY IN CADAVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION—A SINGLE‐CENTER, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY , 1992, Transplantation.
[21] S. Thompson,et al. Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.
[22] George Davey Smith,et al. Meta-analysis: Beyond the grand mean? , 1997, BMJ.
[23] D. Slakey,et al. A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF QUADRUPLE VERSUS TRIPLE THERAPY FOR FIRST CADAVER TRANSPLANTS WITH IMMEDIATE FUNCTION , 1993, Transplantation.
[24] J. Berlin,et al. Effect of anti-lymphocyte induction therapy on renal allograft survival: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.
[25] Christopher H Schmid,et al. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough , 1998, The Lancet.
[26] C H Schmid,et al. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials : How do their results compare ? , 1996 .
[27] Donald A. Berry,et al. Statistical Methodology in the Pharmaceutical Sciences , 1989 .
[28] T R Ten Have,et al. An Empirical Comparison of Several Clustered Data Approaches Under Confounding Due to Cluster Effects in the Analysis of Complications of Coronary Angioplasty , 1999, Biometrics.
[29] S. Piantadosi,et al. Invited commentary: ecologic biases. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.
[30] C S Berkey,et al. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.
[31] J. Robins,et al. Accepting the Limits of Ecologic Studies: Drs. Greenland and Robins Reply to Drs. Piantadosi and Cohen , 1994 .
[32] G A Colditz,et al. Heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies: a commentary. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.
[33] M. McIntosh,et al. The population risk as an explanatory variable in research synthesis of clinical trials. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.
[34] D J Spiegelhalter,et al. Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.
[35] M. Susser. The logic in ecological: II. The logic of design. , 1994, American journal of public health.
[36] J. Berlin,et al. Invited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.
[37] William DuMouchel,et al. Computer-modeling and Graphical Strategies for Meta-analysis , 2000 .
[38] I Olkin,et al. Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data. , 1998, Biometrics.
[39] L. Stewart,et al. Systematic Reviews: Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: how much do we need for reliable and informative meta-analyses? , 1994, BMJ.
[40] J. Robins,et al. Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.